green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion Number
See also, McElveen v. Callahan, 309 So.2d 379 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1975), writ denied, 313 So.2d 602 (La. 1975), wherein the court stated "[p]ayments to be legal must be in the form of salary increases for the future, not extra compensation for past services rendered." *Page 2 However, this office does not consider Article VII, Section 14 as prohibiting the payment of earned compensation retroactive to the time at which the state or a political subdivision obligated itself to make such a payment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion Number
See also, McElveen v. Callahan, 309 So.2d 379 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1975), writ denied, 313 So.2d 602 (La. 1975), wherein the court stated "[p]ayments to be legal must be in the form of salary increases for the future, not extra compensation for past services rendered." (footnotes omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion Number
See also, McElveen v. Callahan , 309 So.2d 379 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1975), writ denied , 313 So.2d 602 (La. 1975), wherein the court stated "[p]ayments to be legal must be in the form of salary increases for the future, not extra compensation for past services rendered." However, this office does not consider Article VII Section 14 as prohibiting the payment of earned compensation retroactive to the time at which the state or a political subdivision obligated itself to make such a payment. 2 Article VII Section 14 is not violated if the state or a political subdivision is under an obligation to ma…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion Number
See also McElveen v. Callahan. 309 So.2d 379 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1975), affirmed 313 So.2d 602 (La. 1975), herein the court stated "[p]payments to be legal must be in the form of salary increases for the future, not extra compensation for past services rendered." In No. 86-639, the Attorney General opined that payments representing salary increases from the time the political subdivision contingently adopted a salary proposal to the time the money became available from reserve legal fees could not be made as such would constitute the retroactive payment of raises.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Voitier v. First National Bank of Commerce
See, e. g., McElveen v. Callahan, 309 So.2d 379, 380-81 (La.App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, 313 So.2d 602 (La.1975); Danna v. Commissioner of Insurance, 228 So.2d 708, 711 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion Number
See also, McElveen v. Callahan , 309 So.2d 379 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1975), writ denied , 313 So.2d 602 (La. 1975), wherein the court stated "[p]ayments to be legal must be in the form of salary increases for the future, not extra compensation for past services rendered." However, this office does not consider Article VII Section 14 as prohibiting the payment of earned compensation retroactive to the time at which the state or a political *Page 3 subdivision obligated itself to make such a payment. 3 Article VII Section 14 is not violated if the state or a political subdivision is under an obligati…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion Number
See also, McElveen v. Callahan , 309 So.2d 379 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied , 313 So.2d 602 (La. 1975), wherein the court stated "[p]ayments to be legal must in *Page 4 the form of salary increases for the future, not extra compensation for past services rendered." McElveen , at page 381.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wayne F. McELVEEN, Ward Three Marshal
v.
Lucas C. CALLAHAN et al.
v.
Lucas C. CALLAHAN et al.
Published
Writ denied. No error of law under the facts found.