Jaramillo v. City of Coral Gables, 436 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Jaramillo v. City of Coral Gables, 436 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Forfeiture of $104,591 in US Currency (fladistctapp, 1991-02-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Forfeiture of $104,591 in US Currency
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1991 · confidence medium
Co., Inc. v. Eagle Nat'l Bank of Miami, 449 So.2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); In re One Chevrolet Blazer, 436 So.2d at 1088; accord Jackson v. State, 570 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Brumlik v. Catalyst, Inc., 463 So.2d 240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Griffith v. State, 435 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); see also The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 499 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 509 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1987), reversed on other grounds, 491 U.S. 524 , 109 S.Ct. 2603 , 105 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989) (post-trial motions are abandoned when filed simultaneously with notice of appeal).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gonzalez v. Metro Dade Police Department
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1991 · confidence medium
Co., Inc. v. Eagle Nat’l Bank of Miami, 449 So.2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); In re One Chevrolet Blazer, 436 So.2d at 1088; accord Jackson v. State, 570 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Brumlik v. Catalyst, Inc., 463 So.2d 240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Griffith v. State, 435 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); see also The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 499 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 509 So.2d 1117 (Fla.1987), reversed on other grounds, 491 U.S. 524 , 109 S.Ct. 2603 , 105 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989) (post-trial motions are abandoned when filed simultaneously with notice of appeal).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adriana JARAMILLO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Julia Jaramillo, and Guillermo Jaramillo
v.
CITY OF CORAL GABLES
Nos. 82-1923, 82-2103.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 6, 1983.
436 So. 2d 1087
Weaver, Weaver & Lardin and Marilyn Liroff, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants., Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley, Miami, Peter G. Stassun, Coral Gables, for appellee.
Ferguson, Hubbart, Pearson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Dade County, by a master plan adopted under authority of the so-called Home Rule Amendment to the Florida Constitution, has undertaken total control of traffic both in the unincorporated and incorporated areas of the county, thereby relieving the municipalities of responsibility for damages resulting from faulty or defective traffic control devices. See A.L. Lewis Elementary School v. Metropolitan Dade County, 376 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Affirmed.