green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Leprettre v. RCS, LLC
See Menard v. Roy Young, Inc., 441 So.2d 28 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1983), writ denied, 444 So.2d 122 (La.1984). “[U]nder the general rule, a contract that is against public policy will not support an equitable defense so as to defeat an award of penalty wages.” Goulas v. B & B Oilfield Servs., Inc., 10-934, 2010-1393 (La.App. 3 Cir. 8/10/11) , 69 So.3d 750, 765 , writ denied, 11-1951 (La. 11/14/11), 75 So.3d 945 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ryan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
See Cowley Corporation v. Shreveport Packing Company, Inc. of Kansas, 440 So.2d 1345, 1352 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983), writ denied, 444 So.2d 122 (La.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. Murray
See Cowley Corp. v. Shreveport Packing Co., Inc., 440 So.2d 1345, 1351 (La.Ct.App.1983), writ denied, 444 So.2d 122 (La.1984); Jefferson Securities Co. v. Benoit, 92 So.2d 487, 488 (La.Ct.App.1957). 19 Second, appellants assert that they signed certain signature pages in blank and that these signatures were later appended to documents different from the ones the makers intended.
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Murray
See Cowley Corp. v. Shreveport Packing Co., Inc., 440 So.2d 1345, 1351 (La.Ct.App.1983), writ denied, 444 So.2d 122 (La.1984); Jefferson Securities Co. v. Benoit, 92 So.2d 487, 488 (La.Ct.App.1957).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Henderson v. Kentwood Spring Water, Inc.
Compare Menard v. Roy Young, Inc., 441 So.2d 28 (La.App. 3d Cir.1983), writ denied, 444 So.2d 122 (La. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fischbach and Moore, Inc. v. Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
See, e.g., Cowley Corp. v. Shreveport Packing Co., 440 So.2d 1345, 1352 (La.App.1983) (citations omitted) ("As in any other contract, acceptance of the offer must be by informed consent---- The creditor must fully understand and be aware that if payment is accepted, the claim will be deemed to have been paid in full---- While the acceptance and cashing of a check for an amount less than that claimed when tendered as full payment constitutes accord and satisfaction and extinguishes the entire debt, the question of whether the check had been tendered and accepted as full payment is a matter of f…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Glen MENARD
v.
ROY YOUNG, INC.
v.
ROY YOUNG, INC.
83-C-2535.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jan 16, 1984.
444 So. 2d 122
Published
Denied.