green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Epperley v. State
See In re B.M., 580 So.2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Stanley v. State, 580 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Weckerle v. State, 579 So.2d 742 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); McCaskill v. State, 520 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Interest OF B.M., a Child.
90-1041.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 19, 1991.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Nancy Perez, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We construe the provision in the trial court's disposition order concerning restitution as one retaining jurisdiction to determine the amount of restitution at a properly noticed hearing after appellant's release from detention, and we affirm the order. See A.P. v. State, 558 So.2d 519 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
ANSTEAD, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.