neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.3 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Florida
v.
Ronald WORLEY, Respondent STATE of Florida v. Thomas M. SCOTT, Respondent STATE of Florida v. Ricky LEWIS
v.
Ronald WORLEY, Respondent STATE of Florida v. Thomas M. SCOTT, Respondent STATE of Florida v. Ricky LEWIS
Nos. 77417, 77415 and 77551.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 10, 1991.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Elaine L. Thompson and Brenda S. Taylor, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner., James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for respondents.
Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the consolidated cases of Worley v. State, 573 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), and Scott v. State, 574 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), in which the Second District Court of Appeal directly conflicts with the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.
We recently held in Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), that legal constraint points are to be assessed once in calculating sentencing scoresheets for offenses committed while on legal constraint. Accordingly, we approve of the decisions below.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.