Bailey v. Lloyd, 62 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1952). · Go Syfert
Search
Bailey v. Lloyd, 62 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: W.D. Development, Inc. v. Seidle (fladistctapp, 1985-02-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" W.D. Development, Inc. v. Seidle
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cassara v. Wofford, 55 So.2d 102 (Fla.1951), aff'd after remand, 62 So.2d 56 (Fla.1952); Affiliated Marketing, Inc. v. Dyco Chemicals & Coatings, Inc., 340 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 353 So.2d 675 (Fla.1977); Weeki Wachee Orchid Gardens, Inc. v. Florida Inland Theatres, Inc., 239 So.2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 246 So.2d 110 (Fla.1971); National Airlines v. Metcalf, 114 So.2d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BAILEY
v.
LLOYD
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 16, 1952.
62 So. 2d 56
Paul' T. Douglas and J. Luther Drew, West Palm 'Beach, for appellant., Phil. O’Connell, West Palm Beach, for appellees.
Hobson, Sebring, Terrell, Thomas.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to make the strong showing which is required of her to persuade this Court to reverse the trial judge’s order granting a new trial. The granting or denying of motion for a new trial rests in the sound judicial discretion of the trial judge and a presumption of correctness attaches to his order. -

We have repeatedly held that it requires a much stronger showing to reverse the trial judge when he has granted a motion for new trial than it does to reverse his order when it is one denying a new trial.

Affirmed upon authority of Mead v. Bentley, Fla. 61 So.2d 428, Martin v. Stone, Fla., 51 So.2d 33, Dent v. Margaret Ann Super Markets, Fla., 52 So.2d 130 and Florida Coastal Theaters, Inc., v. Belflower, 159 Fla. 741, 32 So.2d 738.

SEBRING, C. J., and TERRELL,. THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.