neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Florida
v.
Michael WHITE
v.
Michael WHITE
No. 81082.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 24, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Crim. Appeals and Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner., Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for respondent.
Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw.
Published
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the district court of appeal in White v. State, 609 So.2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), is before this Court for review based on a certified question. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The decision under review is quashed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993).
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.