green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
KWAPIL v. State
We recognize that in Brantley, 685 So.2d at 32, this court declined to decide whether the mailbox rule applied to the filing of a motion to reduce sentence.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lynis SERMONS, Jr.
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 96-179.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec 20, 1996.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carol Ann Turner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant' Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.
Allen, Lawrence, Webster.
Published
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s convictions, but remand with directions to correct the written judgment and sentence to conform to the oral pronouncement of the trial court. See Willis v. State, 656 So.2d 261 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The trial court orally imposed concurrent life sentences for counts I and II, together with a concurrent 30-year sentence for count III. However, the written judgment and sentence reflects the imposition of three concurrent life terms. Appellant need not be present at resentencing.
ALLEN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.