Harris v. State, 726 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Harris v. State, 726 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Devontae Jackson v. State of Florida (fladistctapp, 2024-07-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Devontae Jackson v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2024 · confidence medium
See State v. Cowart, 301 So. 3d 332 , 334 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (stating that on a Rule 3.190(c)(4) motion to dismiss, the state “is not only entitled to receive the most favorable construction of the evidence but also to have all inferences resolved against the defendant”); Natal v. State, 278 So. 3d 705 , 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (observing that in considering whether driving at the speed at issue constitutes recklessness, each case turns on its specific facts and pointing out that “[a] vehicle travelling 100 miles per hour on an interstate highway does not pose the same level of wanton c…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) JOSUE NATAL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
We relied on Copertino v. State, 726 So. 2d 330, 332-33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999): [I]t is one thing to speed slightly over the posted limit, and it is quite another matter to drive at such an immensely excessive rate that no one could reasonably drive.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) JOSUE NATAL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
We relied on Copertino v. State, 726 So. 2d 330, 332-33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999): [I]t is one thing to speed slightly over the posted limit, and it is quite another matter to drive at such an immensely excessive rate that no one could reasonably drive.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Abbey (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
We have held that “the rate of speed of a vehicle can be firmly shown ... to be so excessive under the circumstances that to travel that fast under the conditions is by itself a reckless disregard for human life or the safety of persons exposed to the speed.” Coperlino v. State, 726 So.2d 330, 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Pozo v. State (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
This defendant drove his vehicle at an enormously excessive speed at a time and in a place where it might have been dangerous to exceed the posted limits by even a little. 726 So.2d at 332-33 (emphasis in original).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Dugan v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
Copertino v. State, 726 So.2d 330, 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
cited Cited "see" Benson v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Copertino v. State, 726 So.2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Santisteban v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See Pozo v. State, 963 So.2d 831, 833-34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that evidence was sufficient to support conviction for vehicular homicide where defendant was driving anywhere from 67 to 90 miles per hour in a residential neighbor hood, which alone justified denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal, even though the defendant was also playing with his CD, driving in rainy conditions, and rounding a curve in the road); see also Copertino v. State, 726 So.2d 330, 332-34 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Burke HARRIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
97-2795.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 15, 1999.
726 So. 2d 330
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Dee Ball, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for certification and certify conflict with State v. Wells, ___ So.2d ___, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2000 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 26, 1998), State v. Alleman, ___ So.2d ___, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2000 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 26, 1998), State v. Perry, 716 So.2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) and State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We are consistent with State v. Baxley, 684 So.2d 831 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), rev. den., 694 So.2d 737 (Fla.1997); Johnson v. State, ___ So.2d ___, 1998 WL 74612, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2419 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct.28, 1998) and State v. Hayes, 720 So.2d 1095, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2184 (Fla. 4th DCA Sep. 23, 1998).

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.