State v. Gregersen, 758 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Gregersen, 758 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Covington v. State (fladistctapp, 2000-11-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Covington v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gregersen v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (applying laches), affirmed on other grounds, 758 So.2d 106 (Fla.2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Perry
Fla. · 2001 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Gregersen v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that a coram nobis petition was available to challenge whether a plea was voluntary), approved, 758 So.2d 106 (Fla. 2000), with Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (reaching the opposite conclusion—that a coram nobis was not available to challenge whether a plea was voluntary), quashed, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla. 2000). [4] It is well established that a writ of error coram nobis can correct only errors of fact, not errors of law.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Florida
v.
Era GREGERSEN
No. SC93801.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 27, 2000.
758 So. 2d 106
Neal R. Lewis, Miami, Florida, for Respondent.
Anstead, Harding, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Shaw, Wells.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We have for review Gregersen v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), which certified conflict with the decision in Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

This Court recently held in Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000), that a petition for writ of error coram nobis was the proper vehicle for raising a claim that a noncustodial defendant was not advised of the immigration consequences of a plea. We emphasize that all such claims filed subsequent to our decision in Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), must be filed pursuant to a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Peart, 756 So.2d at 45. Gregersen is approved as being consistent with our decision in Peart.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur. HARDING, C.J., and WELLS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.