green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Snider v. Snider
See, e.g., Haeuser v. Haeuser, 200 Wis.2d 750 , 548 N.W.2d 535 (1996); Poston v. Poston, 160 Vt. 1 , 624 A.2d 853 (1993); Altman v. Altman, 282 Md. 483, 386 A.2d 766 (1978); Maguire v. Maguire, 45 A.D.2d 98, 100 , 356 N.Y.S.2d 125, 126-127 (1974) ("[I]t is well settled that a wife may apply for and be granted support even after her husband has obtained an ex parte foreign divorce.”); Harrod v. Harrod, 34 Colo.App. 172 , 526 P.2d 666 (1974) Foss v. Foss, 83 S.D. 574 , 163 N.W.2d 354 (S.D.1968); Hudson v. Hudson, 52 Cal.2d 735 , 344 P.2d 295, 300-301 (1959); King v. King, 185 Kan. 742 , 347 P.…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Altman v. Altman
Cir. 1955) (applying D.C. law); Sorrells v. Sorrells, 82 So. 2d 684, 686 (Fla. 1955); Pope v. Pope, 2 Ill. 2d 152 , 117 N.E.2d 65, 66 (1954); *494 King v. King, 185 Kan. 742 , 347 P. 2d 381, 388 (1959); Taylor v. Taylor, 242 S.W.2d 747, 749 (Ky. 1951); Malcolm v. Malcolm, 345 Mich. 720 , 76 N.W.2d 831, 834 (1956); Armstrong v. Armstrong, 162 Ohio St. 406 , 123 N.E.2d 267 , 269 (1954), aff’d, 350 U. S. 568 (1956); Seely v. Seely, 348 P. 2d 1064, 1066 (Okla. 1959); Nelson v. Nelson, 71 S. D. 342, 24 N.W.2d 327, 329 (1946); Ische v. Ische, 252 Wis. 250 , 31 N.W.2d 607 , 613 (1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prater v. Prater
See Sorrells v. Sorrells, 82 So.2d 684 (Fla.1955); Kruvand v. Kruvand, 59 So.2d 857 (Fla.1952); Pawley v. Pawley, 46 So.2d 464 (Fla.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 866 , 71 S.Ct. 90 , 95 L.Ed. 632 (1950); Wright v. Wright, 411 So.2d 1334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Hunter v. Hunter, 359 So.2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 365 So.2d 712 (Fla.1978); Ciociola v. Ciociola, 302 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974); Storer v. Storer, 305 So.2d 212 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974), cert. denied, 346 So.2d 994 (Fla.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 955 , 98 S.Ct. 482 , 54 L.Ed.2d 314 (1977); Klein v. Klein, 113 So.2d 855 (Fla. 3rd DCA), …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank LANZA and Florence Lanza, husband and wife
v.
Albert STARTS
v.
Albert STARTS
Buckley & Bland and Warren O. Windle, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants., Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming and Theodore R. Hainline, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellee.
Drew, Hobson, Thomas, Thornal.
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Hoag v. Moeller, Fla.1955, 82 So.2d 138.
DREW, C. J, and THOMAS, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ, concur.