discussed Cited "see" Hazuri v. State See Frasilus v. State, 46 So.3d 1028, 1030-31 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), review denied, 69 So.3d 277 (Fla.2011). 4 The district court concluded that the case before it was distinguishable, as the jury had asked for an answer to a specific fact question regarding the date of a photograph of the defendant, rather than a request for a transcript or the examination of testimony.