green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Nomination Petition of Berg
See Socialist Labor Party v. Rhodes, 318 F.Supp. 1262 (S.D.Ohio 1970), appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 282 , 34 L.Ed.2d 214 (1972). (striking down an Ohio statute requiring independent candidates to have 200 signatures from at least 30 of the state’s 80 counties); Socialist Workers Party v. Rockefeller, 314 F.Supp. 984 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 400 U.S. 806 , 91 S.Ct. 65 , 27 L.Ed.2d 38 (1970) (striking down a New York law requiring at least 50 signatures from each county in the state).
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Zipes
(2×)
See id., at 4, n. 3, citing Sims v. Amos, 340 F. Supp. 691 (MD Ala.) (per curiam) (three-judge court), aff'd, 409 U. S. 942 (1972) (affirming fee award against state legislators who intervened to defend legislative apportionment scheme).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Hutchins, 053170 v. Louis L. Wainwright
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Favre v. Henderson, 464 F.2d 359, 362 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 235 , 34 L.Ed.2d 193 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burton v. Hobbie
(2×)
See Sims v. Amos, 336 F.Supp. 924 (M.D.Ala.), affirmed, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Apportionment Law, Etc.
See Sims v. Amos, 336 F. Supp. 924 (M.D.Ala.) (although recognizing its power to order mid-term elections as plan unconstitutional, court refrains from so doing at its discretion), aff'd, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972). [6] Reliance on Swann v. Adams by the majority is particularly inappropriate since that case did not interpret the provision now before us. [7] Colo.Const., art.
discussed
Cited "see"
Crews v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Cole, 463 F.2d 163 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 238 , 34 L.Ed.2d 193 (1972); United States v. Friedland, supra. Since ours would be a case of inevitable discovery allegedly resulting from “routine investigative procedures,” we need not, and do not, confront the “dual origin” or “illegal initiation” issues.
cited
Cited "see"
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
See Sims v. Amos, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1973), aff’g, 340 F.Supp. 693 (M.D.Ala.1972) (three-judge court); Souza v. Travisono, 512 F.2d 1137, 1139 (1st Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
ca2 1975
See Sims v. Amos, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1973), aff'g, 340 F.Supp. 693 (M.D.Ala. 1972) (three-judge court); Souza v. Travisono, 512 F.2d 1137, 1139 (1st Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Incarcerated Man of Allen County Jail v. Edward Fair, Sheriff of Allen County
See Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691, 694 (M.D.Ala.), aff’d, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hallmark Clinic v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
(2×)
Such an award of fees has in fact been summarily affirmed by the Supreme Court in the only case that seems to have reached that court; see Amos v. Sims, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
A. C. Park v. H. T. (Tommy) Huff
(2×)
See Favre v. Henderson, 5 Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 359, 362 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 235 , 34 L.Ed.2d 193 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stefano Magaddino
See United States v. Cole, 463 F.2d 163, 172 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 238 , 34 L.Ed.2d 193 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fairley v. Patterson
See Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691, 694 (M.D.Ala.) (three-judge court), aff'd. per curiam, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); Dyer v. Love, 307 F.Supp. 974 (N.D.Miss.1969). 35 The second supporting rationale, the private attorney general theory, is derived from the Supreme Court opinions in Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., supra; and Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., supra, 396 U.S. at 389-397.
cited
Cited "see"
Fairley v. Patterson
See Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691, 694 (M.D.Ala.) (three-judge court), aff’d. per curiam, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); Dyer v. Love, 307 F.Supp. 974 (N.D.Miss.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rockefeller v. Powers
“This would be in excess, percentagewise, of anything the Court has approved to date as a precondition to an independent’s securing a place on the ballot and in excess of the 5% which we said in Jenness [v. Fortson, 403 U.S. 431 , 91 S.Ct. 1970 , 29 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971),] was higher than the requirement imposed by most state election codes.” Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 739 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1283 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); see also Socialist Labor Party v. Rhodes, 318 F.Supp. 1262, 1268 (S.D.Ohio 1970) (“Rather than requiring a showing of voter interest, the seven percent, requirement pro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ira Paul Citron
See United States v. Costanzo, 581 F.2d 28 , 34 n. 7 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1067 , 99 S.Ct. 833 , 59 L.Ed.2d 32 (1979); United States v. Parr, 509 F.2d 1381, 1385-86 (5th Cir.1975); see also United States v. Cole, 463 F.2d 163, 167 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 238 , 34 L.Ed.2d 193 (1972) (variation between the amount of income underreported as alleged in the indictment and the amount proven at trial); United States v. D’Anna, 450 F.2d 1201, 1204 (2d Cir.1971) (variance between amounts of tax due as alleged in indictment and amounts proven at trial); United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Ass'n v. Civiletti
See, e.g., Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.) (three-judge court), aff'd, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); Stanford Daily v. Zurcher, 366 F.Supp. 18 (N.D.Cal. 1973), aff'd, 550 F.2d 464 (9th Cir. 1977), rev’d on other grounds, 436 U.S. 547 , 98 S.Ct. 1970 , 56 L.Ed.2d 525 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zarcone v. Perry
See e.g., Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.1972), aff’d, 93 S.Ct. 290 , 409 U.S. 942 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); Sanford Daily v. Zurcher, 366 F.Supp. 18 (N.D.Cal.1973); and cases cited in Alyeska Pipeline, supra, at n. 46.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tisnado v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Cole, 463 F.2d 163, 170 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 238 , 34 L.Ed.2d 193 (1972); Gerberding v. Swenson, 435 F.2d 368, 370 (8th Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tisnado v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Cole, 463 F.2d 163, 170 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 238 , 34 L.Ed.2d 193 (1972); Gerberding v. Swenson, 435 F.2d 368, 370 (8th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vijay v. Satoskar, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Indiana Real Estate Commission
Compare Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 , 693—694 (M.D.Ala.1972), aff’d, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972), with Donahue v. Staunton, 471 F.2d 475, 482-483 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 955 , 93 S.Ct. 1419 , 35 L.Ed.2d 687 (1973), and see discussion of the two in Alyeska Pipeline, 421 U.S. at 270 n. 46, 95 S.Ct. at 1628 n. 46, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony Souza v. Anthony P. Travisono
Compare, e. g., Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 501 F.2d 31 (3d Cir. 1974), and Jordan v. Gilligan, 500 F.2d 701 (6th Cir. 1974), with Class v. Norton, 505 F.2d 123 (2d Cir. 1974), Gates v. Collier, 489 F.2d 298 -(5th Cir. 1973), petition for rehearing en banc granted, 500 F.2d 1382 (5th Cir. 1974), and Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.1972), aff’d mem., 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Elena Class v. Nicholas Norton
See also, Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.) (three-judge court), aff’d mem. 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. B. Taylor v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent
See, e.g., Orleans Parish School Board v. Bush, 242 F.2d 156 (5th Cir. 1957) and the many school cases subsequently decided by this court. 80 'In Sims v. Amos, 336 F.Supp. 924 , 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala. 1972), aff'd., 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972), the District Court for the Middle District of Alabama dealt with the award of attorney's fees and expenses incurred in a suit against the Governor, state legislators, the attorney general and the secretary of state of Alabama.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Milburn v. Huecker
See also Amos v. Sims, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 214 , aff’g, 336 F.Supp. 924 , 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala. 1972).
Henderson, Warden
v.
Favre
v.
Favre
No. 72-151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1972.
Certiorari.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.