green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George X
But see United States v. Staszeuk, 517 F.2d 53, 59-60 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975) (actual effect need not be shown; “realistic probability” of effect is sufficient).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blue v. Armstrong
See Bryan v. Wainwright, 511 F.2d 644, 646 (5th Cir.1975) (citing Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (a)), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 63 , 46 L.Ed.2d 55 (1975); and Boyd v. Scott, 45 F.3d 876, 881 (5th Cir.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles E. Koen
See United States v. Staszcuk, 502 F.2d 875, 881 (7th Cir.1974), modified on other grounds, 517 F.2d 53 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diane Candoli
See United States v. Lobo, 516 F.2d 883, 885 (2d Cir.) (jury instruction challenged based on claim that the instruction implied that codefendant was also guilty of the charged offense) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James William Lewis
See United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 , 57 n. 10 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.
See Napper v. Anderson, Henley, Shields, Bradford & P., 500 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); see also Chandler v. O’Bryan, 445 F.2d 1045, 1057 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1176 , 31 L.Ed.2d 241 (1972) (when district judge considered all questions raised on his hearing of removal of state libel suit and determined that case should be remanded for state court trial, that decision was res judicata on issue of forum).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott Douglas Smith
See United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lena
See United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Lorraine C. Cullen v. Joseph P. Margiotta, Jr.
See United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53, 60 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Digregorio, Hermis Yanis, Jr., Ruben Badillo, John Delvecchio
See United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975) (zoning official extorted payment in consideration of approval of hospital construction that was never undertaken); United States v. Irali, 503 F.2d 1295 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 990 , 95 S.Ct. 1424 , 43 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975) (extortion from potential licensee by liquor license clerk affects future commerce of tavern). 8 Having found that there was sufficient evidence of Chick’s involvement in *1192 commerce during the period in question, we turn next t…
cited
Cited "see"
Krupnick v. Union National Bank
See Napper v. Anderson, Henley, Schields, Bradford & Pritchard, 500 F.2d 634, 636 (5th Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nat Tarnopol
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Staszcuk, 502 F.2d 875, 881 (7th Cir. 1974), modified in banc on other grounds, 517 F.2d 53 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975). 28 The government further contends that the appellants relied upon the packing slips to perpetrate the fraud since receipt of the slips indicated to them that shipment had occurred and that the fraudulent treatment of the sale involving that shipment could, therefore, commence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tarnopol
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Staszcuk, 502 F.2d 875, 881 (7th Cir. 1974), modified in banc on other grounds, 517 F.2d 53 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,007 Willie Bell, Jr. v. Health-Mor, Inc.
See Napper v. Anderson, 500 F.2d 634 (CA5, 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975) (upholding dismissal of claim of private right of action under Wire Fraud Act for lack of subject matter jurisdiction). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John L. Sweet
See United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 (7th Cir. en banc 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , *202 46 L.Ed.2d 56 ; United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1561 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 ; United States v. Gill, 490 F.2d 233 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 968 , 94 S.Ct. 3171 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1139 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chaney v. United States
I.R.C. § 7422(a) (1994); 5 United States v. Michel, 282 U.S. 656 , 51 S.Ct. 284 , 75 L.Ed. 598 (1931); see also Hampton v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 422 , 513 F.2d 1234 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); Sun Chem.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. United States
Sovereign immunity is waived in a tax refund case when the claim is “duly filed” with the IRS. 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (a) (1982); 10 United States v. Michel, 282 U.S. 656, 658 , 51 S.Ct. 284 , 75 L.Ed. 598 (1931); see also Hampton v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 422, 436 , 513 F.2d 1234 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); Sun Chemical Corp. v. United States, 698 F.2d 1203, 1206 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 819 , 104 S.Ct. 81 , 78 L.Ed.2d 91 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Chester Vernon Zeigler, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
However, as this Court noted in Lotspeich , the “nexus between the extortionate conduct and interstate commerce may be de minimis but it must nonetheless exist.” Lotspeich, 796 F.2d at 1270 ; see also United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53, 59 (7th Cir.) (“Nor may we disregard the statutory language which requires the prosecutor to prove some connection with interstate commerce in every ease.”) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold Conn
See also United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53, 59 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (no need to prove that extortion was intended to obstruct or affect interstate commerce), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick W. Hanigan
The purpose of the Act is “to use all the constitutional power Congress has to punish interference with interstate commerce by extortion, robbery or physical violence.” United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 894 (9th Cir. 1981) (per curiam) (quoting Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 215 , 80 S.Ct. 270, 272 , 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1981); see also United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53, 58-59 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (“purpose of the Hobbs Act parallels the central purpose of the Commerce Clause itself”), cert. denied, 423 U.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. United States
See also Hampton v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 422 , 513 F. 2d 1234 , cert. denied, 423 U. S. 837 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Zemek
See also United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); United States v. Augello, 451 F.2d 1167 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1518 , 31 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972). 21 The San Martin court stated: A literal reading of the provision of the statute under consideration indicates that it is aimed at deterring interference with future communication of information.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Zemek
See also United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); United States v. Augello, 451 F.2d 1167 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1518 , 31 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lorenzo Shelton
See also United States v. Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53, 60 (7th Cir. 1975) (en banc) (Stevens, J.) (adopting by reference the panel opinion at 502 F.2d 875, 878 ), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); United States v. Crowley, 504 F.2d 992, 994-95 (7th Cir. 1974); United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 151-53 & n.8 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1562 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975). *921 Under the circumstances recited above, we do not believe that either Supreme Court precedent or precedent in this court and the courts of appeals generally requires revers…
Bernabei
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-1564.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1975.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.