green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hauck v. Mills
we have in the past routinely applied the barker balancing test even in complex conspiracy eases in which the speedy trial period was thought to be nine or ten months.
discussed
Cited "see"
Everton v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See Leiss v. United States, 364 A.2d 803, 807 (D.C.1976) (“It is a well-settled principle that one to whose conduct a statute clearly applies is not entitled to attack it on the ground that its language might be less likely to give fair warning in some other situation not before the court.”), cert. denied 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1654 , 52 L.Ed.2d 362 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bloch v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations…
discussed
Cited "see"
(1996)
See generally United States v. McArthur , 419 F. Supp. 186 (D.N.D.), aff'd 541 F.2d 1275 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied , 430 U.S. 970 (1977). 8 Thus, the Governor is authorized to call the MDDF before calling the MDNG.
cited
Cited "see"
Llewyn J. Cowart v. Edward Hargett, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary
See United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100, 1111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Cowart v. Hargett
See United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100, 1111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Cowart v. Hargett
See United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100, 1111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Craig Kessack, United States of America v. Robert M. Petty, United States of America v. Melvin L. Dewitt, United States of America v. Pasqual Debraine, United States of America v. Jordan Rodrigues Quintal, Jr., United States of America v. Gary Granger
See United States v. Scully, 546 F.2d 255, 260 (9th Cir.1976), cert. den., 430 U.S. 970 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boertje v. United States
(2×)
Because of its unique nature, the exercise of citizens’ First Amendment right of free speech on the White House grounds may be regulated in a “more stringent [manner] ... than would be tolerated on most other government properties.” Smith v. United States, 445 A.2d 961, 965 (D.C.1982) (en banc); accord, Leiss v. United States, 364 A.2d 803, 808 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1654 , 52 L.Ed.2d 362 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Airway Heights v. Dilley
See United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372, 375-77 (4th Cir. 1974); Wrynn v. United States, 200 F. Supp. 457, 464 (E.D.N.Y. 1961); see generally United States v. Casper, 541 F.2d 1275 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 52 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Grom
See United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100, 1108-09 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Morgan v. District of Columbia
(2×)
In Gaetano v. United States, 406 A.2d 1291 (D.C.1979), this court acknowledged, with reference to the unlawful entry statute, D.C.Code § 22-3102 (1981), the validity of the “bona fide belief” defense, i.e., “a reasonable belief in an individual’s right to remain on property not owned or possessed by that individual.” 406 A.2d at 1294 ; accord Leiss v. United States, 364 A.2d 803, 809 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1654 , 52 L.Ed.2d 362 (1977); Jackson v. United States, 357 A.2d 409, 411 (D.C.1976); Smith v. United States, 281 A.2d 438, 439-40 (D.C.1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Austain Toner, Colm Murphy
See United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100, 1118 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Huey
(2×)
The American Bar Association commentary endorses allowing the judge to determine the factual basis by *732 “any appropriate procedure which seems best for his court and the kind of case involved.” ABA Standards, Pleas of Guilty 33 (1968); see People v. Nyberg, 64 Ill. 2d 210, 214 , 356 N.E.2d 80 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S. Ct. 1654 , 52 L.
cited
Cited "see"
McCoy Jamerson v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1110 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. A. Guy Crouch, III and Michael J. Frye
See, e.g., United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977); United States v. Butts, 524 F.2d 975 (5th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cunningham
See also United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100, 1110 (CA5 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 [ 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 ] (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Allen Eugene Hartley and John Joseph Murphy
(2×)
See also United States v. McArthur, 419 F.Supp. 186, 194 (D.N.D.1975), aff'd sub nom., United States v. Casper, 541 F.2d 1275 (8th Cir.1976) (per curiam), *115 cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1654 , 52 L.Ed.2d 362 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J.B. Stoner v. Charles Graddick, Attorney General of Alabama and Freddie Smith, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections
United States v. Durnin, 632 F.2d 1297, 1299 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980); United States v. Parker, 586 F.2d 422, 430-32 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); United States v. Willis, 583 F.2d 203, 207 (5th Cir.1978); see also United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100 , 1107 & n. 9 (5th Cir.1976) (stating that both actual prejudice and bad faith delay are required, but recognizing that both prongs might not be necessary in extraordinary cases), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bolin
See also United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100 , 1109 n. 13 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977); State v. Black, 587 S.W.2d 865 , 872 & n. 6 (Mo.App.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salmon
See also, United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977) (speedy trial should be measured from date of original arrest despite dismissal of original indictment where dismissal resulted not from unrelated charges pending in another court but from desire to prosecute same charges in a more convenient forum). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick G. Henry
Compare United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977) and United States v. McKim, 509 F.2d 769 (5th Cir. 1975) (both applying the Barker test) with United States v. Davis, 487 F.2d 112 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 981 , 94 S.Ct. 1573 , 39 L.Ed.2d 878 (1974) (applying the due process test).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Banks v. Ferrell
(2×)
See, e. g., Leiss v. United States, D.C.App., 364 A.2d 803 , 807 & n. 4 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1654 , 52 L.Ed.2d 362 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stanzione
See, e. g., United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100 , 1107 n.9 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977); United States v. Vispi, 545 F.2d 328 , 332 n.4 (2d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stanzione
See, e. g., United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100 , 1107 n.9 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1656 , 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977); United States v. Vispi, 545 F.2d 328 , 332 n.4 (2d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Michael Baker
See also United States v. Scully, 546 F.2d 255 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970 , 97 S.Ct. 1168 , 60 L.Ed.2d 578 , supra. Yet there remains the question whether by reason of any flaw in the Jones affidavit peculiar to Judd the showing was insufficient to sustain interception of conversations over Judd’s telephone, including those of Baker.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewart v. State
See also United States v. Avalos, 541 F. 2d 1100, 1110 (CA5 1976), cert. denied, 430 U. S. 970 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. MacDonald
See also United States v. Avalos, 541 F. 2d 1100, 1110 (CA5 1976), cert. denied, 430 U. S. 970 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Casper
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-5681.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1977.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: M.D. Tennessee (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.