green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 7×
14.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"intending with bad purpose either to disobey or disregard the law"
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Most of the venire simply did not pay an inordinate amount of attention to Watergate”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[m]ost of the venire simply did not pay an inordinate amount of attention to Watergate”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Nowak
recusal is not indicated by prior judicial rulings, or in-court comments prompted by developments in the case or prior legal proceedings, or the exercise of related judicial functions.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stanley Zulkowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
ur jurisdiction extends only to orders of the district court. these orders must be definitive, effective, and in a posture capable of affirmance or reversal.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Zulkowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp. (Appeal of Central Jersey Industries, Inc.)
ur jurisdiction extends only to orders of the district court. these orders must be definitive, effective, and in a posture capable of af-firmance or reversal.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Modarressi
ost of the venire simply did not pay an inordinate amount of attention to watergate
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Saunders
most of the venire simply did not pay an inordinate amount of attention to watergate
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Gunnison
(2×)
intending with bad purpose either to disobey or disregard the law
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Platshorn
mere conclusions, opinions, rumors or vague gossip are insufficient
discussed
Cited "see"
Canales v. State
See Granviel v. State, 552 S.W.2d 107, 124 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2642 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977) (rejecting claims that jury selection process produces “conviction-prone” and “death-penalty qualified” jurors and that jury selection process also denies equal protection “because a different jury selection process is employed against the class of persons accused of capital crimes without any rational or reasonable justification for applying such procedure”).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Page
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert, denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Maurice
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 33 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Betts
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 33 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charlene D. Holloway
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 64-65 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois v. Betts (In Re Betts)
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 133 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 110 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Ruben Inigo, United States of America v. Raul Armando Giordano, United States of America v. Bruno Skerianz
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 61-62 (D.C.Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Esquivel
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 107 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977), quoted in United States v. Slade, 627 F.2d 293, 301 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 608 , 66 *442 L.Ed.2d 495 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Korab
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 123-24 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Central Ice Cream Co.
See U.S. v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 , 138 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1989
See generally United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 68-69 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977). 26 Because the courthouse located within the venue of appellants' charged offenses, the Northweastern Division of the District of North Dakota, lacked adequately sized courtrooms, appellants' trial was held in the Southeastern Division.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Grey Bear
See generally United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 81 , 68-69 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Stephen C. Perry
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 81 , 138 (D.C.Cir.1976) (where sole purpose of mandamus petition is to contest intrinsic merits of a judicial act, the judge is at most a nominal party), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); United States v. King, 482 F.2d 768 , 772 & n. 24 (D.C.Cir.1973) (similar); Walker v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 443 F.2d 33, 34 (7th Cir.1971) (similar); General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Watkins, 363 F.2d 87, 88-89 (4th Cir.) (en banc) (similar), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 899 , 87 S.Ct. 204 , 17 L.Ed.2d 131 (1966); Rapp v. Van Dusen,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation v. Bellefonte Borough
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 , *435 138-139 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977), rehearing denied, 433 U.S. 916 , 97 S.Ct. 2992 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1103 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doering v. Fader
(2×)
See United States v. Haldeman, 181 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 356 n. 301, 559 F.2d 31 , 133 n. 301 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); United States v. Gilboy, 162 F. Supp. 384, 394 (M.D.Pa. 1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Barron v. State
See Granviel v. State, 552 S.W.2d 107, 118 (Tex.Crim.App.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2642 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonardo Bruno
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 79-80 (D.C.Cir.1976) ce rt. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977) and United States v. Gleason, 616 F.2d 2, 29 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 931 , 100 S.Ct. 1320 , 63 L.Ed.2d 764 (1980), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1082 , 100 S.Ct. 1037 , 62 L.Ed.2d 767 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Dunleavy
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 139 (D.C.Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 (1977); Amidon, 604 P.2d at 577 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1989
See Link v. Mercedes-Benz of North Am., 550 F.2d 860 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977) (declining to review question certified on section 1292(b) appeal on the ground that matter was one of fact).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas N. Shiomos
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 , 85 n. 135 (D.C.Cir.1976) (citing Baker v. United States, 401 F.2d 958, 968 (D.C.Cir.1968)), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); see also United States v. Morrone, 502 F.Supp. 983, 1002-03 (E.D.Pa.1980), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc.
See Link v. Mercedes-Benz of North Am., 550 F.2d 860 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977) (declining to review question certified on section 1292(b) appeal on the ground that matter was one of fact).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Finley
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 60-63 (D.C.Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Goldman v. Bryan
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 139 (D.C.Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 (1977); Amidon, 604 P.2d at 577 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Shapiro v. Ewing Kauffman, Avron Fogelman, Marion Laboratories, Inc., Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 , 64 n. 43 (D.C.Cir.1976) (public opinion poll results open to a variety of errors), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); accord, United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241, 252 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 846 , 103 S.Ct. 102 , 74 L.Ed.2d 92 (1982); see also United States v. Mandel, 431 F.Supp. 90, 100-01 (D.Md.1977) (public opinion poll no substitute for voir dire examination); United States v. Means, 409 F.Supp. 115, 116-17 (D.N.D.1976) (fair trial may be had in spite of local prejudice revealed through opinion poll)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Eugene Kevin Wells v. Edward Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 60 , (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977). 3 10 In other, less extreme situations, when external events such as pretrial publicity raise a strong possibility of jury bias, 4 the court has a duty to determine whether the accused may have a fair trial.
cited
Cited "see"
Cletis Meredith Miller v. William Bolger, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and the United States of America
See Link v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., 550 F.2d 860, 863 (3d Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Haynes
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 124 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols Chagra
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 111 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Andrews v. Shulsen
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 , 60 n. 28 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prince v. State
(2×)
See Granviel v. State, 552 S.W.2d 107, 122 (Tex.Crim.App.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2642 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); Diaz v. State, 473 S.W.2d 492, 493 (Tex.Crim.App.1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 , 130 n. 276 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc) (per curiam), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); accord In re IBM Corp., 618 F.2d 923 , 932 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980); see also FTC v. Cement Institute, 333 U.S. 683, 702 , 68 S.Ct. 793, 804 , 92 L.Ed. 1010 (1948) (most matters relating to judicial disqualification do not rise to a constitutional level); Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 523 , 47 S.Ct. 437, 441 , 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927) ("All questions of judicial qualification may not involve constitutional validity.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Holley
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 79-80 (D.C.Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); United States v. Tucker, 526 F.2d 279, 283 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 958 , 96 S.Ct. 1738 , 48 L.Ed.2d 203 (1976); United States v. Potts, 420 F.2d 964, 965 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 1855 , 26 L.Ed.2d 276 (1970); cf. United States v. Gleason, 616 F.2d 2, 29 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 931 , 100 S.Ct. 1320 , 63 L.Ed.2d 764 (1980); United States v. Projansky, 465 F.2d 123, 139-41 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1006 , 9…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru Kamiyama
(2×)
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 115-16 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); cf. United States v. Dibrizzi, 393 F.2d 642, 644 (2d Cir.1968) (dealing with intent to embezzle).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodger Wagoner
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 90-91 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re C.B.S., Inc.
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977), and In re: National Broadcasting Co., 635 F.2d 945 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yanez
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 106-07 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert, denied sub nom., Mitchell et a1. v. United States, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977) (unauthenticated transcript of related case); United States v. DeLaFuente, 548 F.2d 528, 531-32 (5th Cir.), cert, denied sub nom., Stewart v. United States, 431 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 2640 , 53 L.Ed.2d 249 (1977) (unauthenticated written authorization for wiretap); United States v. Barnes, 443 F.Supp. 137 , 139 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir.1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harlan M. Balk, David Balk, Paul Patton, and Billy R. Carey, Defendants
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 81 , 79-80 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zamora v. State
See Livingston v. State, 542 S.W.2d 655 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2642 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977). 101 S.Ct. at 1876, n. 12 , citing 602 F.2d 694 at 708, n. 19 (5th Cir.1979). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Steiner v. Equimark Corp.
See Link v. Mercedes-Benz of No. America, Inc., 550 F.2d 860 , 864 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
The Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana v. Harry L. Laws Company, Inc.
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 131 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977) (submitting § 144 motions to fellow judges for decision is “at most permissive.”) Referring the motion to another judge raises problems of administrative inconvenience and delay.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Abrams
See United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 125 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fields v. State
See Livingston v. State, 542 S.W.2d 655 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), cert. denied 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2642 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); Shippy v. State, 556 S.W.2d 246 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 935 , 98 S.Ct. 422 , 54 L.Ed.2d 294 (1977); Von Byrd v. State, 569 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.Cr.App.1978), cert. denied 441 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 2418 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1979); Wilder v. State, 583 S.W.2d 349 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), and Gholson v. State, 542 S.W.2d 395 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), cert. denied 432 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2960 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1977).
Livingston
v.
Texas Granviel v. Texas Harris v. Georgia
v.
Texas Granviel v. Texas Harris v. Georgia
No. 76-6326; No. 76-6401; No. 76-6407.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1977.
Brennan, Certiorari, Death, Insofar, Sentences, Undisturbed.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Arizona Supreme Court (2) · Third Circuit (2) · S.D. Florida (2) · N.D. Illinois (1) · D. Massachusetts (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; Ct. Crim, App. Tex.; and Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.
See Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976) (Brennan, J., dissenting); id., at 231 (Marshall, J., dissenting).