In Re Nowak  ·  1992-03-20  ·  N.D. Illinois  ·  pin 431 U.S. at 933

“recusal is not indicated by prior judicial rulings, or in-court comments prompted by developments in the case or prior legal proceedings, or the exercise of related judicial functions.”

Stanley Zulkowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.  ·  1988-08-11  ·  Third Circuit  ·  pin 431 U.S. at 933

"[O]ur jurisdiction extends only to orders of the district court. These orders must be definitive, effective, and in a posture capable of affirmance or reversal."

Zulkowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp. (Appeal of Central Jersey Industries, Inc.)  ·  1988-07-19  ·  Third Circuit  ·  pin 431 U.S. at 933

“[0]ur jurisdiction extends only to orders of the district court. These orders must be definitive, effective, and in a posture capable of af-firmance or reversal.”

United States v. Modarressi  ·  1988-02-12  ·  D. Massachusetts  ·  pin 431 U.S. at 933

“[m]ost of the venire simply did not pay an inordinate amount of attention to Watergate”

United States v. Saunders  ·  1985-03-21  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 431 U.S. at 933

“Most of the venire simply did not pay an inordinate amount of attention to Watergate”

State v. Gunnison  ·  1980-09-22  ·  Arizona Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 431 U.S. at 933

"intending with bad purpose either to disobey or disregard the law"

United States v. Platshorn  ·  1980-07-07  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 431 U.S. at 933

“Mere conclusions, opinions, rumors or vague gossip are insufficient”