green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.8 score
“the clear congressional intent to require filing of valid proofs of claims within the established time limits precludes any exceptions based on general equitable principles.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
University Hospitals of Cleveland v. Emerson Electric Company and Emerson Electric Company Benefit Plan
(2×)
But see Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 267 (6th Cir. 1988) (stating that "the standard of review is no different whether the appeal is actually denied or is deemed denied"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 (1988).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Keene Corp. v. Acstar Insurance (In Re Keene Corp.)
Accord Coleman v. Espy, 986 F.2d at 1188 (compensatory civil contempt claim not affected where underlying injunction abated by a subsequent change in legislation); Klett v. Pirn, 965 F.2d 587, 590 (8th Cir.1992) (same); Backo v. Local 281, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, 438 F.2d 176, 182 (2d Cir.1970) (compensatory civil contempt claim not affected by lapse of order and termination of underlying action), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 858 , 92 S.Ct. 110 , 30 L.Ed.2d 99 (1971); United States v. Timan Laboratories, Inc., 1981 WL 1774 (D.R.I.) (although the inability to comply with the coerc…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Analytical Systems, Inc., Debtor. Itt Commercial Finance Corp. v. Virginia Dilkes
the clear congressional intent to require filing of valid proofs of claims within the established time limits precludes any exceptions based on general equitable principles.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Redfield v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (In Re Robertson)
unless an employer is shown to control administration of a plan, it is not a proper party defendant in an action concerning benefits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sergio Rodriguez v. Raymours Furniture(074603)
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 334 , 537 A.2d 652 (stating that LAD seeks “nothing less than the eradication of the cancer of discrimination” (quotation marks and citations omitted), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arquilla-Romeo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
See Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 267 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988) (“A plan administrator has broad discretion in deciding questions of coverage and eligibility for benefits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Santiago v. New York & New Jersey Port Authority
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 337-38 , 537 A.2d 652 (finding notice requirements inapplicable to LAD claims), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); Owens v. Feigin, 194 N.J. 607, 613-14 , 947 A.2d 653 (2008) (holding the notice requirements do not apply to claims under the CRA); Racanelli v. Cnty. of Passaic, 417 N.J.Super. 52, 59 , 8 A.3d 782 (App.Div.2010) (holding the notice requirements do not apply to CEPA claims).
cited
Cited "see"
Gadberry v. BETHESDA, INC.
See Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 266 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Owens v. Feigin
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 337-38 , 537 A.2d 652 (finding TCA’s notice requirements inapplicable to LAD claims), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); Brook v. April, 294 N.J.Super. 90, 100 , 682 A.2d 744 (App.Div.1996) (holding that TCA’s requirements are inapplicable to claims brought under Workers’ Compensation Law); see also Brennan v. Norton, 350 F.3d 399, 431-33 (3d Cir.2003) (predicting that our Court would not find TCA’s notice requirements applicable to CEPA actions); Lakes v. Brigantine, 396 N.J.Super. 65, 69 , 931 A.2d 622 (Law Div.200…
cited
Cited "see"
Ferrell v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
See Collins v. Barry, 841 F.2d 1297 , 1300 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
James D. Ferrell v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban Development
See Collins v. Barry, 841 F.2d 1297 , 1300 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berner v. ENCLAVE CONDO. ASS'N
See generally Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 334 , 537 A. 2d 652 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1988). [1] In granting Enclave summary judgment as to plaintiff, the motion judge, focusing upon N.J.S.A. 10:5-3 and our decision in Catalane v. Gilian Instrument Corp., 271 N.J.Super. 476 , 638 A. 2d 1341 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 136 N.J. 298 , 642 A. 2d 1006 (1994), said in part: I'm satisfied that the reading of 10:5-3 is consistent with the interpretation by Catalane .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lowe v. Zarghami
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 330-31 , *615 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied sub. nom., University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beegan v. Associated Press
See Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 266 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 , (1988); McLaughlin v. Reynolds, 886 *74 F.Supp. 902, 906 (D.Me.1995); Marcum v. Zimmer, 887 F.Supp. 891, 894 (S.D.W.Va.1995); Rossi, 833 F.Supp. at 67 ; Green v. Eastern Airlines, 138 F.R.D. 146, 147 (M.D.Fla.1991); Adamo v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 720 F.Supp. 491, 498 (W.D.Pa. 1989); Reynolds v. Bethlehem, 619 F.Supp. 919, 928 (D.Md.1984); Foulke v. Bethlehem 1980 Salaried Pension Plan, 565 F.Supp. 882, 883 (E.D.Pa.1983); Boyer v. JA.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Flores
See State v. Moran (1988), 231 Mont. 387, 391 , 753 P.2d 333, 336, cert. denied (1988), 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S. Ct. 75 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Witowski v. Tetra Tech, Inc.
See Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan, 914 F.2d 1279, 1287 (9th Cir.1990) (quoting Gelardi) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1087 , 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991) and Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 266 (6th Cir.1988) (permitting benefits recovery action against the party controlling administration of the plan), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Allen v. Krause
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 330-31 , 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied sub nom, University of Med. and Dentistry of N.J. v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wajner v. Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 330-31 , 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); see also N.J.S.A. 59:3-1 (a public employee is not liable for an injury where a public entity is immune from liability for that injury).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Does
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gooslin v. Holland
See Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 267 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 (1988); Odom v. United Mine Workers Health and Retirement Funds, 687 F.2d 843, 846 (6th Cir.1982). 7 Upon review, we conclude that the trustees' decision was not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.
cited
Cited "see"
Watkins v. Shared Hospital Services Corp.
See Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263 , 268 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Morris R. Gardner v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
See Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Loranger v. Stierheim
See Medical Laundry Serv. v. Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama, Birmingham, 856 F.2d 128 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 77 , 102 L.Ed.2d 53 (1988) 2 The genesis of the Norman hour-by-hour rule is somewhat problematic.
cited
Cited "see"
Loranger v. Stierheim
See Medical Laundry Serv. v. Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama, Birmingham, 856 F.2d 128 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 77 , 102 L.Ed.2d 53 (1988). .
cited
Cited "see"
James W. Blair v. Umwa Health and Retirement Funds
See Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 267 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 (1988); Odom v. United Mine Workers of Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gurganus v. Continental American Life Insurance Co.
See Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local No. 391 v. Terry, 494 U.S. 558 , 110 S.Ct. 1339 , 108 L.Ed.2d 519 (1990) (the right to a jury trial is determined by ‘the nature of the issues involved and the remedy sought’).” See, also, Bair v. General Motors Corp., 895 F.2d 1094 (6th Cir.1990) (no right to a jury trial under § 1132(a)(1)(B), reaffirming Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988)); Anthony v. Texaco, Inc., 803 F.2d 593 (10th Cir.1986) (characterizing a § 1132(a)(1)(B) claim alleging the wrongful withho…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Gurganus
(2×)
See Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local No. 391 v. Terry, 494 U.S. 558 , 110 S.Ct. 1339 , 108 L.Ed.2d 519 (1990) (the right to a jury trial is determined by `the nature of the issues involved and the remedy sought')." See, also, Bair v. General Motors Corp., 895 F.2d 1094 (6th Cir.1990) (no right to a jury trial under § 1132(a)(1)(B), reaffirming *906 Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988)); Anthony v. Texaco, Inc., 803 F.2d 593 (10th Cir.1986) (characterizing a § 1132(a)(1)(B) claim alleging the wrongful withhol…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cairns v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
See Anderson v. Great West Life Assurance Company, 942 F.2d 392, 394 (6th Cir.1991), citing Daniel v. Eaton, 839 F.2d 263 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1989) and Cook v. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees of Cyclops Corporation, 801 F.2d 865 (6th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Key West Harbour Development Corp. v. City of Key West
See Medical Laundry Service v. Board of Trustees, 840 F.2d 840 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 77 , 102 L.Ed.2d 53 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brangman v. AstraZeneca, LP
“If so, the administrator, rather than the employer, is the proper party, not the employer, unless the employer has controlled or influenced the administrator’s decision in regard to awarding pension benefits.” Id.; see also Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263 , 266 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988); Adamo v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 720 F.Supp. 491, 498 (W.D.Pa.1989); Foulke v. Bethlehem 1980 Salaried Pension Plan, 565 F.Supp. 882 (E.D.Pa.1983); Marcum v. Zimmer, 887 F.Supp. 891, 894 (S.D.W.Va. 1995) (collecting cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. Harris
(2×)
See also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 334 ("[T]he overarching goal of the [LAD] is nothing less than the eradication of the cancer of discrimination." (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S. Ct. 75 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowles v. City of Camden
Lehmann v. Toys ‘R’ Us, Inc., 132 N.J. 587, 619 , 626 A.2d 445 (1993) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency, Sec. 219); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied sub nom., University of Medicine & Dentistry v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pens. Plan Guide P 23932n Deborah Lampkins v. Robert H. Golden
See Faircloth, 91 F.3d at 659 ; Moothart, 21 F.3d at 1506 ; see, e.g., Bartling, 29 F.3d at 1068-69 (affirming a statutory penalty where, despite the lack of bad faith or prejudice, the district court had imposed the penalty "only because of the [large] number of Plaintiffs that were involved."); see also Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 268 (6th Cir.1988) (affirming an assessment of penalties against a plan administrator even though there was no evidence that the delay was deliberate or that any prejudice had resulted), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 (1988). 14 Furthermore, the district court…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunter v. Supreme Court of New Jersey
See, e.g., Stern v. Nix, 840 F.2d 208 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 77 , 102 L.Ed.2d 53 (1988); Cohran v. State Bar of Georgia, 790 F.Supp. 1568 (N.D.Ga.1992); see also Middlesex Cty.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Powell v. Powell
See Liedel v. Juvenile Court of Madison County, 891 F.2d 1542, 1545 (11th Cir.1990); see also Stern v. Nix, 840 F.2d 208, 211-12 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 77 , 102 L.Ed.2d 53 (1988) (holding that because district court holding would “effectively reverse the state court judgment,” the federal claim was “inextricably intertwined” with the state court judgment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
See Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 70 , 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2312 , 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A.2d 652 , 654 cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
See Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 70 , 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2312 , 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A.2d 652 , 654 cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Aldrich v. Manpower Temp. Services
See also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 336 , 537 A. 2d 652 , cert. denied sub nom., University of Medicine and Dentistry of N.J. v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abbamont v. Piscataway Tp.
Lehmann v. Toys `R' Us, Inc., 132 N.J. 587, 619 , 626 A. 2d 445 (1993) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency, Sec. 219); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A. 2d 652 , cert. denied sub nom., University of Medicine & Dentistry v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blackwell v. Mayor & Commissioners of Delmar
See, e.g., Coast-land Corp., 734 F.2d at 178 (every breach of contract by a state does not create a constitutional claim); Braden, 636 F.2d at 93 (same); see also Medical Laundry Servs. v. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama, 840 F.2d 840, 843 (11th Cir.) (Roney, C.J., dissenting) (compiling cases holding that breach of contract by the state is not a constitutional deprivation), modified, 856 F.2d 128 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 77 , 102 L.Ed.2d 53 (1988), appeal after remand, 906 F.2d 571 (11th Cir.1990) (adopting dissent).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
TL v. ToysR'Us, Inc.
See Huddleston v. Roger Dean Chevrolet, Inc., 845 F. 2d 900, 904-05 (11th Cir.1988); College-Town v. Massachusetts Comm'n Against Discrimination, 400 Mass. 156 , 508 N.E. 2d 587, 593 (1987); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 340-41 , 537 A. 2d 652 (Handler, J., concurring), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis v. Sawbrook Steel Castings Co.
See, e.g., Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988); Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348 (9th Cir.1984); United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers v. Amcast Industrial Corp., 634 F.Supp. 1135 (S.D.Ohio 1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sandom v. Travelers Mortgage Services, Inc.
Compare Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 333 , 537 A.2d 652 (1988), cert. denied sub nom., University of Medicine & Dentistry v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988) (citing cases which have held that sexual discrimination is injurious and tortious).
Hargrove
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-2062.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
488 U.S. 826
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1) · N.D. Illinois (1)
Ct. Mil. App. Certiorari denied.