Nelson v. Jones, 511 U.S. 1020 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Nelson v. Jones, 511 U.S. 1020 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Sandoval (nmd, 2007-01-22) · Strongest negative: Oswaldo Javier Reyes v. State (texapp, 2012-02-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Oswaldo Javier Reyes v. State
Tex. App. · 2012 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, e.g., United States v. Washington , 11 F.3d 1510, 1517 (10th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 511 U.S. 1020 (1994) (holding that Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination does not apply to PSI interview); United States v. Woods , 907 F.2d 1540, 1543 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 1070 (1991) (holding defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel not violated because routine PSI interview not critical stage of proceedings in which counsel’s presence or advice is necessary); Trimmer v. State , 651 S.W.2d 904 , 905–06 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1983, pet. ref’…
discussed Cited "but see" Oswaldo Javier Reyes v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2012 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, e.g., United States v. Washington, 11 F.3d 1510, 1517 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1404 , 128 L.Ed.2d 76 (1994) (holding that Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination does not apply to PSI interview); United States v. Woods, 907 F.2d 1540, 1543 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1070 , 111 S.Ct. 792 , 112 L.Ed.2d 854 (1991) (holding defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel not violated because routine PSI interview not critical stage of proceedings in which counsel’s presence or advice is necessary); Trimmer v. State, 651 S.W.2d 904,…
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Nguyen
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Washington, 11 F.3d 1510, 1516 (10th Cir.Xholding "at least as concerns making guideline calculations the issue of a higher than a preponderance standard is foreclosed in this circuit”), cert. denied 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1404 , 128 L.Ed.2d 76 (1994). . § 3.Bl.l(b) states “If the defendant was a manager or supervisor (but not an organizer or leader) and the criminal activity involved five or more participants or was otherwise extensive, increase by 3 levels.”
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Watts (2×)
SCOTUS · 1997 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Washington, 11 F. 3d 1510, 1516 (CA10 1993) ("At least as concerns making guideline calculations the issue of a higher than a preponderance standard is foreclosed in this circuit"), cert. denied, 511 U. S. 1020 (1994). [1] Compare Williams v. New York, 337 U. S. 241, 247-248 (1949) ("Reformation and rehabilitation of offenders have become important goals of criminal jurisprudence"), with 28 U. S. C. § 994 (k) (rejecting rehabilitation as a goal of imprisonment) and 18 U. S. C. § 3553 (a)(2) (stating that punishment should serve retributive, deterrent, educational, an…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sandoval
D.N.M. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Washington, 11 F.3d 1510, 1516 (10th Cir.1993)(“At least as concerns making guideline calculations the issue of a higher than a preponderance standard is foreclosed in this circuit.”) cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1404 , 128 L.Ed.2d 76 (1994).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Hopkins
D. Kan. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Washington, 11 F.3d 1510, 1516 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1404 , 128 L.Ed.2d 76 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Tishon Brown, AKA Clarence Brown, Jr. Tishon Brown, United States of America v. Clarence Brown, AKA Tishon Brown Tishon Brown (2×)
3rd Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Mabry, 3 F.3d 244, 248 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, Edwards v. U.S., 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S. Ct. 1403 , 128 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Brown
3rd Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Mabry, 3 F.3d 244, 248 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , Edwards v. U.S., 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1403 , abrogation on other grounds recognized in United States v. Sheppar d, 219 F.3d 766, 767 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, ___ S.Ct. ___ (2001).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Washington
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Washington, 11 F.3d 1510, 1511, 1518 (10th Cir.1993), cert denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1404 , 128 L.Ed.2d 76 (1994).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Washington
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Washington, 11 F.3d 1510, 1511, 1518 (10th Cir. 1993), cert denied, 511 U.S. 1020 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Lambert v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. Oklahoma, 433 U.S. 682 , 97 S.Ct. 2912 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1977) (underlying felony and felony murder merge into one offense for purposes of double jeopardy in Oklahoma). [6] 1993 OK CR 22 , 852 P.2d 744 , cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994) [hereinafter Hain I ].
discussed Cited "see" Lewis v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hain v. State, 1993 OK CR 22 , 852 P.2d 744, 751 , cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Tilley v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hain v. State, 1993 OK CR 22 , 852 P.2d 744, 748 , cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Trujillo
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Meuli, 8 F.3d 1481, 1487 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1403 , 128 L.Ed.2d 76 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Willingham v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hain v. State, 852 P.2d 744, 749 (Okl.Cr.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994), quoting Vowell v. State, 728 P.2d 854, 857-58 (Okl.Cr.1986) The existence of extensive pretrial publicity through the news media does not itself demand individual voir dire.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States of America v. Forestell Norman Sheppard
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Mabry, 3 F.3d 244, 250 (8th Cir.1993), cert. *768 denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1403 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Forestell N Sheppard
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Mabry, 3 F.3d 244, 250 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Van White v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Salazar v. State, 1993 OK CR 21, ¶¶ 31-46 , 852 P.2d 729, 737-741 ; See also Hain v. State, 1993 OK CR 22, ¶¶ 48-49 , 852 P.2d 744, 752-753 , cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994). ¶ 93 Because we find reversible error as to Appellant’s first proposition of error, a new sentencing hearing must be conducted.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sandle
5th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Mabry, 3 F.3d 244, 251 (8th Cir.1993) (noting that “felony drug offense” in section 841(a)(1)(B) is defined “to include any felony drug offense under state law”), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020 , 114 S.Ct. 1403 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nelson
v.
Jones
No. 93-7028.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1994.
511 U.S. 1020
Published

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.