Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Div. v. United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers, 522 U.S. 979 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Div. v. United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers, 522 U.S. 979 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Parnoff (conn, 2018-07-03) · Strongest negative: State v. Liebenguth (conn, 2020-08-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Liebenguth
Conn. · 2020 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Sandul v. Larion, 119 F.3d 1250, 1252, 1255 (6th Cir.) (when passenger in vehicle traveling at high rate of speed shouted ‘‘ ‘[fuck] you’ ’’ and extended his middle finger at abortion protesters who were located considerable distance away, there was no face- to-face contact between passenger and protesters, no protester was offended or even acknowledged passen- ger’s behavior, and entire incident was over in matter of seconds, ‘‘it was inconceivable that [the passenger’s] fleeting actions and words would provoke the type of lawless action’’ necessary to satisfy …
discussed Cited "see" State v. Parnoff
Conn. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sandul v. Larion , 119 F.3d 1250 , 1255-56 (6th Cir.) (holding that "the use of the 'f-word' in and of itself is not criminal conduct," and that, in light of Supreme Court precedent, its use does not amount to fighting words because "the mere words and gesture 'f-k you' are constitutionally protected speech"), cert. dismissed, 522 U.S. 979 , 118 S.Ct. 439 , 139 L.Ed.2d 377 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division, AVCO Corp.
v.
United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
No. 97-463.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1997.
522 U.S. 979
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 29, 1997. Brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, January 28, 1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, February 18, 1998. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.