In re Nagy, 529 U.S. 1065 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Nagy, 529 U.S. 1065 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bonita Perry v. Commonwealth of PA (ca3, 2009-05-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bonita Perry v. Commonwealth of PA
3rd Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Bd. of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 , 121 S.Ct. 955 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001) and Bd. of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 529 U.S. 1065 , 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000) (granting certiorari on the issue of “[wjhether the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution bars suits by private citizens in federal court under the Americans With Disabilities Act against non-consenting states”).
cited Cited "see" Tony Eugene Saffold v. Anthony Newland
9th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bennett v. Artuz, 199 F.3d 116 (2d Cir.1999), cert. granted, 529 U.S. 1065, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000). .
cited Cited "see" Fronczak v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Garrett v. University of Alabama, 193 F.3d 1214 (1999), cert. granted, 529 U.S. 1065 , 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000). .
discussed Cited "see" Bylsma v. Bailey
M.D. Ala. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Garrett v. The University of Alabama at Birmingham Board of Trustees, 193 F.3d 1214 (11th Cir.1999), cert. granted on another issue sub nom, 529 U.S. 1065 , 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Thomas v. Nakatani
D. Haw. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See University of Ala. at Birmingham Bd. of Trustees v. Garrett, 529 U.S. 1065 , 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (April 17, 2000) (granting certiorari); see also Walker v. Missouri Dep’t of Corrections, 213 F.3d 1035 , 1036 n. 2 (8th Cir.2000) (noting that the question presented in Garrett is “Does the 11th Amendment bar suits by private citizens in federal court under [the ADA] against nonconsenting states?”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Nagy
No. 99-8470.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 2000.
529 U.S. 1065
Published

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.