green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In The Matter Of Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc.
Compare Dryden v. Ranger Refining & Pipe Line Co., 280 F. 257 (CA5), Cert. denied, 260 U.S. 726 , 43 S.Ct. 89 , 67 L.Ed. 483 (1922), and Continental Coal Corp. v. Roszelle Bros., 242 F. 243 (CA6, 1917), With Shearin v. Cortez Oil Co., 92 F.2d 855 (CA5, 1937), and Burdick v. Dillon, 144 F. 737 (CA1, 1906).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co.
Compare Dryden v. Ranger Refining & Pipe Line Co., 280 F. 257 (CA5), cert. denied, 260 U.S. 726 , 43 S.Ct. 89 , 67 L.Ed. 483 (1922), and Continental Coal Corp. v. Roszelle Bros., 242 F. 243 (CA6, 1917), with Shearin v. Cortez Oil Co., 92 F.2d 855 (CA5, 1937), and Burdick v. Dillon, 144 F. 737 (CA1,1906).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mobile Shipbuilding Company
v.
Federal Bridge & Structural Company
v.
Federal Bridge & Structural Company
No. 465.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1922.
Mr, .Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Elmer Schlesinger, Mr. Chauncey G. Parker and Mr. Henry M. Ward for petitioner. Mr. Amos C. Miller and Mr. William E. Black lor respondent.
Published
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.