United States v. California Midway Oil Co., 263 U.S. 682 (1923). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. California Midway Oil Co., 263 U.S. 682 (1923). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon (ca1, 1987-06-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon (2×)
1st Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. California Midway Oil Co., 259 F. 343, 352-53 (S.D.Cal.1919), aff'd, 279 F. 516 (9th Cir.1922), aff'd, 263 U.S. 682 , 44 S.Ct. 136 , 68 L.Ed. 504 (1923). 55 Requiring that RICO claims based on mail fraud be proved by clear and convincing evidence would further the policy of discouraging claims that are difficult and time-consuming to prove.
discussed Cited "see" Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A. (2×)
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. California Midway Oil Co., 259 F. 343, 352-53 (S.D.Cal.1919), affd, 279 F. 516 (9th Cir.1922), affd, 263 U.S. 682 , 44 S.Ct. 136 , 68 L.Ed. 504 (1923).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
California Midway Oil Company
No. 62.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 10, 1923.
263 U.S. 682
Mr. H. L. Underwood, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck was on the brief, for the United States. Mr. Geo. E. Whitaker and Mr. U. T. Clotfelter, for ap-pellees, submitted.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority of Washington Securities Co. v. United States, 234 U. S. 76, 78; Baker v. Schofield, 243 U. S. 114, 118; Southern Ry. Co. v. Puckett, 244 U. S. 571, 574; Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co., 254 U. S. 1, 13.