green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Henderson
See McKinley, 53 N.M. at 110 , 202 P.2d at 966 (upholding CDM statute as not being unconstitutionally vague, and noting that the legislature may create offense by defining it as an act which produces a certain result) (quoting State v. Friedlander, 141 Wash. 1 , 250 P. 453, 455 (1926), appeal dismissed, 275 U.S. 573 , 48 S.Ct. 17 , 72 L.Ed. 433 (1927)).
Thomas M. Adams
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 15.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1927.
Dismissed per stipulation of counsel, on motion of Solicitor. General Mitchell, Attorney General Galloway, and Mr. A. W. Gregg, General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, for the United States. Messrs. Simeon S. Willis and H. R. Dysart for appellant.
Published
Appeal from the Court of Claims.