neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.4 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomson
v.
Dana
v.
Dana
No. 529.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1932.
Mr. W. Y. Masters for appellants., Mr. Chester E. McCarty, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, with whom Mr. I. H. Van Winkle, Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellees.
Published
Per Curiam:
Decree affirmed. Manchester v. Massachusetts, 139 U. S. 240; Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S. 133; Miller v. McLaughlin, 281 U. S. 261; Wampler v. LeCompte, 282 U. S. 172; Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 79, 80; Crescent Cotton Oil Co. v. Mississippi, 257 U. S. 129, 137; Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co., 260 U. S. 245, 255; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 369, 370.