McDonald v. United States, 301 U.S. 697 (1937). · Go Syfert
McDonald v. United States, 301 U.S. 697 (1937). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Star Tribune v. BD. OF EDUC., SP. SCHOOL (minnctapp, 1993-11-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1937 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1937 1981 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Star Tribune v. BD. OF EDUC., SP. SCHOOL
Minn. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
Minn.Stat. § 645.17(4) (1992); see McDonald v. United States, 89 F.2d 128, 133 (8th Cir.) (“[W]hen a statute uses words whose meaning under judicial decisions' has become well-known and well-settled, it will be presumed that the Legislature used such words in the sense justified by long judicial sanction.”), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 697 , 57 S.Ct. 925 , 81 L.Ed. 1352 (1937); Minnesota Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Mattson, 274 N.W.2d 116, 119 (Minn.1978) (“Words and phrases which have acquired an established meaning by judicial construction are deemed to be used in the same sense in a *872 su…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gabriel Parra Lopez
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., McDonald v. United States, 89 F.2d 128, 138-39 (8th Cir. 1937), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 697 (1937).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gabriel Parra Lopez
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., McDonald v. United States, 89 F.2d 128, 138-39 (8th Cir.1937), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 697 , 57 S.Ct. 925 , 81 L.Ed. 1352 (1937).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McDonald
v.
United States
No. 897.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1937.
301 U.S. 697
Messrs. Edward M. Keating, Everett Jennings, and William■ L. Vandeventer for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General McMahon, and Mr. William W. Barron for the United States.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.