Stuyvesant Ins. v. Sussex Fire Ins., 302 U.S. 742 (1937). · Go Syfert
Search
Stuyvesant Ins. v. Sussex Fire Ins., 302 U.S. 742 (1937). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. New York Central Railroad (mad, 1963-07-10) · Strongest negative: In Re GHR Companies, Inc. (mab, 1984-06-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" In Re GHR Companies, Inc.
Bankr. D. Mass. · 1984 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, e.g., In re Utilities Power & Light Corp., 90 F.2d 798 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 742 , 58 S.Ct. 144 , 82 L.Ed. 573 (1937) (appointment of examiner warranted to investigate allegations of wrongdoing by directors of debtor corporation as within the court’s discretion, based on principles of equity). 17 .
discussed Cited "see" John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. New York Central Railroad
D. Mass. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Utilities Power & Light Corp., (7 Cir.), 91 F.2d 598 , cert. den. 302 U.S. 742 , 58 S.Ct. 144 , 82 L.Ed. 573 , and Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Henwood, (8 Cir.), 86 F.2d 347 , 108 A.L.R. 1020 , cert. den. 300 U.S. 661 , 57 S.Ct. 492 , 81 L.Ed. 870 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Manning
W.D. La. · 1963 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, In re Utilities Power and Light Corp., 90 F. 2d 798 (C.A. 7, 1937), certiorari denied, Associated Investing Corp. v. Utilities Power & Light Corp., 302 U.S. 742 , 58 S.Ct. 144 , 82 L.Ed. 543 ; In re Joslyn’s Estate, 171 F.2d 159 (C.A. 7, 1949); Bair v. Bank of America Nat.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stuyvesant Insurance Co.
v.
Sussex Fire Ins. Co.
No. 457.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1937.
302 U.S. 742
Messrs. Robert Kelly Prentice, John A. Hartpence, and Thomas G. Haight for petitioner. Mr. Arthur T. Vanderbilt for respondent.
Published

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.