New Negro All. v. Sanitary Grocery Co., 304 U.S. 542 (1938). · Go Syfert
Search
New Negro All. v. Sanitary Grocery Co., 304 U.S. 542 (1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: American Medical Ass'n v. United States (cadc, 1942-10-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1939 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1939 1982 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" American Medical Ass'n v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1942 · signal: see · confidence high
See New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co., 303 U.S. 552, 562, 563 , amended, 304 U.S. 542 , 58 S.Ct. 703, 708 , 82 L.Ed. 1012 : “ * * * short of fraud, breach of the peace, violence, or conduct otherwise unlawful. * * * ”; United States v. Hutcheson, 312 U.S. 219, 231 , 61 S.Ct. 463, 466 , 85 L.Ed. 788 : “Therefore, whether trade union conduct constitutes a violation of the Sherman Law is to be determined only by reading the Sherman Law and § 20 of the Clayton Act and the Norris-LaGuardia Act as a harmonizing text of outlawry of labor conduct.” 52 Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader, 310 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
New Negro Alliance
v.
Sanitary Grocery Co.
No. 511.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1938.
304 U.S. 542
Cited by 35 opinions  |  Published

It is ordered that the opinion in this cause be amended (lj by striking out the last three sentences in the first full paragraph on page 5 and substituting therefor the following: “The Court of Appeals thought thát the dispute'was not a labor dispute within the Norris-LaGuardia Act because it did not involve terms and conditions of employment such as wages, hours,- unionization or betterment of, working conditions, and that the trial court, therefore; had jurisdiction to issue the injunction. We think the conclusion that the dispute was not a_ labor dispute within the meaning of the Act, because it did not involve terms and conditions of employment in the sense of Wages, hours, unionization or betterment of working conditions is erroneous.”;

(2) By striking out of the second full paragraph on page 6 the first and second sentences and so much of the third sentence as reads: “In the first place” and starting a new sentence with a capital “T”;

(3) By striking out the words. “In the second place” in the fourth sentence in the second full paragraph on page 6 and beginning the sentence with a capital “T.”

Opinion reported as amended, 303 U. S. 552.