Hughes v. Wisconsin Tax Comm'n Et Al., 304 U.S. 548 (1938). · Go Syfert
Search
Hughes v. Wisconsin Tax Comm'n Et Al., 304 U.S. 548 (1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: International Business MacHines Corporation v. United States of America, International Business MacHines Corporation, and Cravath, Swaine & Moore v. United States of America, International Business MacHines Corporation v. David N. Edelstein, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southerndistrict of New York, and United States of America (ca2, 1974-05-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) International Business MacHines Corporation v. United States of America, International Business MacHines Corporation, and Cravath, Swaine & Moore v. United States of America, International Business MacHines Corporation v. David N. Edelstein, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southerndistrict of New York, and United States of America
2d Cir. · 1974 · confidence medium
In Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 548 (1938), the Supreme Court made it very clear that a waiver 'is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.' 304 U.S. at 464.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) International Business Machines Corp. v. United States
2d Cir. · 1973 · confidence medium
In Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 548 (1938), the Supreme Court made it very clear that a waiver “is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.” 304 U.S. at 464.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John M. Hughes
v.
Wisconsin Tax Commission, F. v. Haboeck, Assessor of Income
996.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1938.
304 U.S. 548
Mr. S. W. Jensch for appellant., Mr. Joseph E. Messerschmidt for appellees.
Per Curiam.
Published
Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Morris v. Alabama, 302 U. S. 642. (2) Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U. S. 276, 279-281; New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 U. S. 308, 313.