United States v. Stone, 308 U.S. 519 (1939). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Stone, 308 U.S. 519 (1939). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Carlisle v. United States (scotus, 1996-05-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1940 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1940 1983 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Carlisle v. United States (2×)
SCOTUS · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ex parte United States, 101 F. 2d 870, 878 (CA7 1939), aff'd by an equally divided Court in United States v. Stone, 308 U. S. 519 (1939).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Davis
N.M. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: compare · confidence low
We recognize the difference of opinion, in other jurisdictions, as to such authority: Compare Ex parte United States, 101 F.2d 870 (7th Cir. 1939), aff’d by an equally divided court, 308 U.S. 519 , 60 S.Ct. 177 , 84 L.Ed. 441 (1939); and State v. Superior Court in and for Co. of Maricopa, 103 Ariz. 319 , 441 P.2d 548 (1968) with State ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Stone, United States District Judge
No. 48.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 22, 1939.
308 U.S. 519
Assistant Attorney General. Arnold, with whom Solicitor General Jackson, and Messrs. Charles H. Weston and John Henry Lewin were on the brief, for the United States. Mr. Weymouth Kirkland, with wfyom Messrs. Howard Ellis, John L. Mclnerney, and David Fisher were on the brief, for respondent.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court'.