Nat'l Elec. Signal Co. v. City of Electra, 309 U.S. 686 (1940). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Elec. Signal Co. v. City of Electra, 309 U.S. 686 (1940). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the rules of civil procedure became effective while the suit was pending and whether they should have been applied was in the discretion of the court____”
47 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Drozda v. McComas (arizctapp, 1994-09-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1942 1984 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Drozda v. McComas
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the rules of civil procedure became effective while the suit was pending and whether they should have been applied was in the discretion of the court____
discussed Cited "see" June Roth v. Nathan Pritikin and Patrick M. McGrady Jr.
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, ownership of the copyright would, accordingly, be presumed to lie with the “person at whose instance and expense the work [was] done.” Brattleboro Publishing Co. v. Winmill Publishing Corp., 369 F.2d 565, 567 (2d Cir.1966); see Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 108 F.2d 28 (2d Cir.1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 686 , 60 S.Ct. 891 , 84 L.Ed. 1029 (1940).
cited Cited "see" Murray v. Gelderman
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 108 F.2d 28 (2 Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 686 , 60 S.Ct. 891 , 84 L.Ed. 1029 (1940).
cited Cited "see" Murray v. Gelderman
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 108 F.2d 28 (2 Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 686 , 60 S.Ct. 891 , 84 L.Ed. 1029 (1940).
cited Cited "see" Murray v. Gelderman
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 108 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 686 , 60 S.Ct. 891 , 84 L.Ed. 1029 (1940).
cited Cited "see" Murray v. Gelderman
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 108 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 686 , 60 S.Ct. 891 , 84 L.Ed. 1029 (1940).
cited Cited "see" Locke Manufacturing Co. v. Sabel
W.D. Ky. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doyle v. Loring, 107 F.2d 337, 340 (6th Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 686 , 60 S.Ct. 808 , 84 L.Ed. 1029 (1940).
discussed Cited "see" Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Jerry Vogel Music Co.
2d Cir. · 1947 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co., D.C., 25 F.Supp. 361, 364 (where attorneys’ fees were awarded on the defendant’s counterclaim for a declaratory judgment), affirmed, 2 Cir., 108 F.2d 28 , certiorari denied 309 U.S. 686 , 60 S.Ct. 891 , 84 L.Ed. 1029 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Electric Signal Co.
v.
City of Electra
No. 795.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1940.
309 U.S. 686
Mr. Munson H. Lane for petitioner., Messrs. Henry R. Ashton and S. J. Brooks for respondents.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Arizona (1)

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.