Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co., 312 U.S. 711 (1941). · Go Syfert
Search
Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co., 312 U.S. 711 (1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nowlin v. Scurr (iowa, 1983-03-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943 1984 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Nowlin v. Scurr
Iowa · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ex parte Hull, 312 U.S. 546, 549 , 61 S.Ct. 640, 642 , 85 L.Ed. 1034, 1036 , reh. denied, 312 U.S. 716 , 61 S.Ct. 823 , 85 L.Ed. 1146 (1941) (regulation prohibiting state prisoners from filing habeas petitions unless they were “properly drawn” unconstitutional).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Automatic Devices Corp.
v.
Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co.
No. 277.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1941.
312 U.S. 711
Messrs. Drury W. Cooper, Thomas J. Byrne, and Henry M. Huxley for petitioner. Messrs. Bernard A. Schroeder, Russell Wiles, and George A. Chritton for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The motion for leave to file petition for rehearing is granted. The petition for rehearing is granted. The order denying certiorari, 311 U. S. 673, is vacated and the petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is granted, limited to the question whether claims 2, 3, and 11 of the Mead patent No. I, 736,544 are valid.