green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1946 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1946
1986
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ashley, Drew & Northern Railway Co. v. United Transportation Union
Accord, Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Keystone Freight Lines, Inc., 126 F.2d 931, 934 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 645 , 63 S.Ct. 37 , 87 L.Ed. 519 (1942) (Motor Carrier Act requirements do not enlarge federal injunctive jurisdiction in a case involving a labor dispute beyond limitations of Norris-LaGuardia).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ashley, Drew & Northern Railway Company v. United Transportation Union And Its Affiliated Local No. 1121
Accord, Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Keystone Freight Lines, Inc., 126 F.2d 931, 934 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 645 , 63 S.Ct. 37 , 87 L.Ed. 519 (1942) (Motor Carrier Act requirements do not enlarge federal injunctive jurisdiction in a case involving a labor dispute beyond limitations of Norris-LaGuardia).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, an Unincorporated Association v. Ralph C. Bishop, United States Marshal
See Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Keystone Freight Lines, 126 F.2d 931, 933 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 645 , 63 S.Ct. 37 , 87 L.Ed. 519 (1942) (plaintiff could not enjoin defendant carrier to comply with contract when, due to plaintiff’s dispute with its employees, employees of defendant refused to handle plaintiff’s freight).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Florida East Coast Railway Company
See Lee Way Motor Freight v. Keystone Freight Line, Inc., 10 Cir., 1942, 126 F.2d 931 , cert. den., 317 U.S. 645 , 63 S.Ct. 37 , 87 L.Ed. 519 , applying the Norris-LaGuardia Act in a comparable factual situation, and cf. Marine Cooks & Stewards, AFL v. Panama S.S.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mason
v.
Merced Irrigation District
v.
Merced Irrigation District
No. 159.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1942.
Messrs. George T. Davis and Peter turn Suden for petitioner. Mr. Stephen W. Downey for respondent.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.