green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas v. United States
While such proof is not explicitly mandated by our burglary statute, 5 the case law requires it in order to “negative the defendant’s right to break and enter, and to protect him from a second prosecution for the same offense.” Cady v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 10, 13 , 293 F. 829, 832 (1923); accord, Bord v. United States, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 205, 206 , 133 F.2d 313, 314 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 671 , 63 S.Ct. 77 , 87 L.Ed. 539 (1942).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yost v. Johnson
See, e.g., Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Finance Corp., Del.Supr., 25 A.2d 383, 391 , cert.denied, 317 U.S. 671 , 63 S.Ct. 79 , 87 L.Ed. 539 (1942); Bata v. Hill, Del.Ch., 139 A.2d 159, 165 (1958); Brown v. Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barry
v.
Chrysler Corporation
v.
Chrysler Corporation
No. 393.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 26, 1942.
Messrs. Patrick J. Lucey and Gerald G. Barry for petitioners. Mr. Frank Parker Davis for respondents.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.