green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Exide Technologies
See Palmer v. Hoffman, 318 U.S. 109, 114 , 63 S.Ct. 477 , 87 L.Ed. 645 (1943), reh’g denied 318 U.S. 800 , 63 S.Ct. 757 , 87 L.Ed. 1163 (1943); United States v. Casoni, 950 F.2d 893, 910-911 (3d Cir.1991); Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. Sinkovich, 232 F.3d 200, 205 (4th Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. United States Department of Agriculture
(2×)
See Palmer v. Hoffman, 318 U.S. 800 , 63 S.Ct. 757 , 87 L.Ed. 1163 (1943) (holding that an accident report prepared by a railroad did not carry the indicia of reliability of a routine business record because it was prepared at least partially in anticipation of litigation); United States v. Stone, 604 F.2d 922, 925-26 (5th Cir.1979) (holding that an affidavit prepared by an official of the United States Treasury Department was unreliable because it was prepared in anticipation of litigation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richfield Oil Corporation v. Karseal Corporation
Co., 7 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 858, 860-862 ; Franklin v. Shelton, 10 Cir., 1957, 250 F.2d 92, 98 ; See, Palmer v. Hoffman, 1943, 318 U.S. 109, 119 , 63 S.Ct. 477 , 87 L.Ed. 645 , rehearing denied 318 U.S. 800 , 63 S.Ct. 757 , 87 L.Ed. 1163 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
BFC Chemicals, Inc. v. Smith-Douglass, Inc.
See also, Palmer v. Hoffman, 318 U.S. 109, 116 , 63 S.Ct. 477, 482 , 87 L.Ed. 645 (1943), reh’g denied, 318 U.S. 800 , 63 S.Ct. 757 , 87 L.Ed. 1163 , 7 Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 61.11 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re the City of New York
Pro., § 392; People v. Kohlmeyer, 284 N. Y. 366, 369 ; Johnson v. Lutz, 253 N. Y. 124 ; Roberto v. Nielson, 288 N. Y. 581 ; see, also, Palmer v. Hoffman, 318 U. S. 109 , rehearing denied 318 U. S. 800 , and Del Re v. City of New York, 180 Misc. 525 .) ” (Italics in original.) In Williams v. Alexander ( 309 N. Y. 283 , supra) the court held that it was improper to admit in evidence a hospital record containing a statement by plaintiff as to the manner in which the accident had happened.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Samuels
Pro., § 392; People v. Kohlmeyer, 284 N. Y. 366, 369 ; Johnson v. Lutz, 253 N. Y. 124 ; Roberto v. Nielson, 288 N. Y. 581 ; see, also, Palmer v. Hoffman, 318 U. S. 109 , rehearing denied 318 U. S. 800 , and Del Re v. City of New York, 180 Misc. 525 .) It is true that the Bellevue and Matteawan Hospital records, while admitted in evidence for the limited purpose of “ facilitating the questioning of the experts ”, were never submitted to the jury, under the trial court’s ruling, but a serious error was committed when the People’s psychiatrists, Drs.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex parte James B. Goodrich Ex parte John Mosher (317 U. S. 603) Baker
v.
Hunter, Warden (317 U. S. 711) and Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Power Commission
v.
Hunter, Warden (317 U. S. 711) and Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Power Commission
No. 451; No. 616.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1943.
Applications, Consideration, Took.
Published
Petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.