green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.4 score
“comfort and pleasure”
Treatment trajectory · 1947 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1947
1986
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg
(2×)
Respondent Weinstein and others did seek appraisal under Virginia law in the Virginia courts; their claims were rejected on the explicit grounds that although "[s]tatutory appraisal is now considered the exclusive remedy for stockholders opposing a merger," App. to Pet. for Cert. 32a; see Adams v. United States Distributing Corp., 184 Va. 134 , 34 S. E. 2d 244 (1945), cert. denied, 327 U. S. 788 (1946), "dissenting stockholders in bank mergers do not even have this solitary remedy available to them," because "Va. Code § 6.1-43 specifically excludes bank mergers from application of § 13.1-730…
discussed
Cited "see"
Merrill Trust Company v. United States
See Industrial Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 1 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 592 , 169 A.L.R. 144 , certiorari denied 1946, 327 U.S. 788 , 66 S.Ct. 807 , 90 L.Ed. 1014 ; Gammons v. Hassett, 1 Cir., 1941, 121 F.2d 229 , certiorari denied 1941, 314 U.S. 673 , 62 S.Ct. 136 , 86 L.Ed. 539 ; Newton Trust Co. v. Commissioner, supra. Cf. Third National Bank and Trust Co. of Springfield v. United States, 1 Cir., 1956, 228 F.2d 772 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Glynn Batson, South Plains Land Corporation, a Corporation, and Johnny Lemmons, United States of America v. Dale Leverett, Cletus Leverett and Wayne Leverett, United States of America v. Lois Prather, United States of America v. T.A. Wartes, Wayne Hicks, Bill Wartes and Gene Irwin, United States of America v. A. Earl Jones, United States of America v. Don H. Wilson, United States of America v. Earl Bowman, Ernest L. Bowman, J.E. Aldridge, Don Carmichael and Estate of Everett M. Bowman
Compare United States v. Dawes, 151 F.2d 639, 643 (7th Cir.1945), cert. denied, 327 U.S. 788 , 66 S.Ct. 808 , 90 L.Ed. 1015 (1946) (fraud tolling does not apply to False Claims Act limitations, 31 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Batson
Compare United States v. Dawes, 151 F.2d 639, 643 (7th Cir.1945), cert. denied, 327 U.S. 788 , 66 S.Ct. 808 , 90 L.Ed. 1015 (1946) (fraud tolling does not apply to False Claims Act limitations, 31 U.S.C. § 235 ), and United States v. Borin, 209 F.2d 145 , 147 — 48 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 (1954) (same), with General Electric Company v. City of San Antonio, 334 F.2d 480, 483-85 (5th Cir.1964) (fraud tolling does apply to Clayton Act limitations, 15 U.S.C. § 15b; Borin limited).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
United States Distributing Corp.
v.
United States Distributing Corp.
No. 788.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 11, 1946.
John J. Wicker, Jr. for petitioners. William W. Crump and James V. Hayes for respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Maine (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia-denied.