discussed Cited "see" Nicholi v. State See People v. Peete, 28 Cal.2d 306 , 169 P.2d 924 (1946), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 790 , 67 S.Ct. 356 , 91 L.Ed. 677 , reh. denied, 329 U.S. 832 , 67 S.Ct. 490 , 91 L.Ed. 705 , cert. denied, 331 U.S. 783 , 67 S.Ct. 1185 , 91 L.Ed. 1815 , cited by this court in Watson v. State, 387 P.2d 289, 293 (Alaska 1963).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Shonubi See, e.g., People v. Peete, 28 Cal.2d 306 , 169 P.2d 924 , cert. denied, 329 U.S. 790 , 67 S.Ct. 356 , 91 L.Ed. 677 (1946) (strikingly similar murders committed 20 years apart); id., 28 Cal.2d at 328 , 169 P.2d 924 (Carter, J., dissenting) (arguing, unconvincingly, that the defendant would not have used the same “m.o.” that resulted in earlier arrest).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Daniels One such exception “is that evidence of other crimes is admissible to show a pattern, scheme, design, project or plan of which the two crimes are a part.” (People v. Cassandras, 83 Cal.App.2d 272, 279 [ 188 P.2d 546 ]; see, also, People v. Peete, 28 Cal.2d 306 [ 169 P.2d 924 ], cert. denied 329 U.S. 790 [ 67 S.Ct. 356 , 490, 91 L.Ed. 677 ] ; note, 35 Cal.L.Rev.131.) The rule, supported by many authorities, is thus stated in 8 California Jurisprudence page 69, section 173: “Where several crimes are connected as part of one scheme or plan, all of the same general character, and tending to …