green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1948 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1948
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Vacated
State of Iowa v. Christine Ann Kern
Essentially, the State argues Kern and the State entered into a contract that establishes consent under Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 227-28 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2047-48 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854, 863 (1973), and Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624, 628-29 , 66 S.Ct. 1277, 1279 , 90 L.Ed. 1477, 1482 (1946), judgment vacated by 330 U.S. 800 , 67 S.Ct. 857 , 91 L.Ed. 1259 (1947).
cited
Vacated
State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon III
See Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624, 628-29 , 66 S.Ct. 1277, 1279 , 90 L.Ed. 1477, 1482 (1946), judgment vacated by 330 U.S. 800 , 67 S.Ct. 857, 91 .
cited
Cited "see"
Brian H. Herschfus v. City of Oak Park, Mich.
See Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624 , 628–29 (1946), judgment vacated on other grounds by Zap v. United States, 330 U.S. 800 (1947) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Office Depot, Inc.
See Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624, 628 (1946), vacated on other grounds, 330 U.S. 800 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
Munoz, Vicente
(2×)
See Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624, 626-27 , 66 S. Ct. 1277 (1946), vacated on other grounds, 330 U.S. 800 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Woods
IV.) A search conducted without a warrant is unreasonable per se under the Fourth Amendment unless it falls within one of the "specifically established and well-delineated exceptions." ( Katz v. United States (1967) 389 U.S. 347, 357 , 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 ; Bravo, supra, 43 Cal.3d at p. 609 , 238 Cal.Rptr. 282 , 738 P.2d 336 .) It is "well settled that one of the specifically established exceptions to the requirements of both a warrant and probable cause is a search that is conducted pursuant to consent." ( Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973) 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Woods
(Bravo, supra, 43 Cal.3d at p. 608 ; accord, Zap v. United States (1946) 328 U.S. 624, 628-629 [ 66 S.Ct. 1277, 1279-1280 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 ], vacated (1947) 330 U.S. 800 [ 67 S.Ct. 857 , 91 L.Ed. 1259 ].) 1 For nearly three decades, this court has upheld the legality of searches authorized by probation terms that require probationers to submit to searches of their residences at any time of the day or night by any law enforcement officer with or without a warrant.
cited
Cited "see"
Abateco Services, Inc. v. Theron J. Bell, etc.
See Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624 , 66 S.Ct. 1277 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 (1946) rev’d on other grounds, 330 U.S. 800 , 67 S.Ct. 857 , 91 L.Ed. 1259 (1947).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Harris Methodist Fort Worth, Cross-Appellant
See Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624, 628 , 66 S.Ct. 1277, 1279 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 (1946), rev’d on other grounds, 330 U.S. 800 , 67 S.Ct. 857 , 91 L.Ed. 1259 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fowler v. New York City Department of Sanitation
See Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624, 628 , 66 S.Ct. 1277, 1279 , 90 L.Ed.2d 1477 (1946) (court found voluntary consent although the only way to attain government business was to submit to a search), judgment vacated on unrelated issues, 330 U.S. 800 , 67 S.Ct. 857 , 91 L.Ed. 1259 (1947); McMorris v. Alioto, 567 F.2d 897, 901 (9th Cir.1978) (courthouse search); United States v. Doran, 482 F.2d 929, 932 (9th Cir.1973) (airport search); Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309, 317 , 91 S.Ct. 381, 385 , 27 L.Ed.2d 408 (1971) (voluntary consent where the government makes public aid contingent on visits to …
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellant Cross– v. HARRIS METHODIST FORT WORTH
See Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624, 628 , 66 S.Ct. 1277, 1279 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 (1946), rev'd on other grounds, 330 U.S. 800 , 67 S.Ct. 857 , 91 L.Ed. 1259 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maralex Res., Inc. v. Jewell
See, e.g. , Zap v. United States , 328 U.S. 624 , 628, 66 S.Ct. 1277 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 (1946) (holding that contractor who, in order to obtain government business, agreed by contract to permit inspection of his accounts and records during business hours, waived any rights to privacy he might otherwise have had with respect to business documents related to the *985 government contract), vacated on other grounds , 330 U.S. 800 , 67 S.Ct. 857 , 91 L.Ed. 1259 (1947) ; see also Copar Pumice Co. v. Morris , 632 F.Supp.2d 1055 , 1079-80 (D.N.M. 2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Strecker
See e.g., Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624, 629 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 , 66 S.Ct. 1277 (1946), vacated on reh. on other grounds 330 U.S. 800 (1947); State v. Jakeway, 221 Kan. 142 , Syl. ¶ 4, 558 P.2d 113 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Maurice A. Hutcheson v. United States
See also Zap v. United States, 330 U.S. 800 , 67 S.Ct. 857 , 91 L.Ed. 1259 (1946), 329 U.S. 824 , 67 S.Ct. 107 , 91 L.Ed. 700 (1946), 328 U.S. 624 , 66 S.Ct. 1277 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 (1946).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zap
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1947.
330 U.S. 800
Morris Lavine for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Washington, W. Marvin Smith, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file a second petition for rehearing and to recall the mandate is granted. The second petition for rehearing is granted and the judgment entered June 10, 1946, 328 U. S. 624, and order denying rehearing entered October 21, 1946, 329 U. S. 824, are vacated. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the indictment. Ballard v. United States, 329[*801] U. S. 187. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Morris Lavine for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Washington, W. Marvin Smith, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.