neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1947 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1947
1986
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Pullman Company Otis & Co. v. United States Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States and Glore, Forgan & Co. v. United States
v.
Pullman Company Otis & Co. v. United States Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States and Glore, Forgan & Co. v. United States
No. 253; No. 254; No. 255; No. 256.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1947.
Holmes Baldridge argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Washington and Assistant Attorney General Berge. Thurman Arnold argued the cause for appellant in No. 254. With him on the brief was Arne C. Wiprud. Robert J. Bulkley argued the cause for appellants in No. 255. With him on the brief were Frank J. Meistrell and Herbert G. Pillen. Leo F. Tierney argued the cause for appellant in No. 256. With him on the brief was Louis A. Kohn. George Wharton Pepper argued the cause for the Pullman Company et al., appellees. With him on the brief were Ralph M. Shaw, Seth W. Richardson, Lowell M. Greenlaw, Frederick H. Spotts and Guy A. Gladson. Jacob Aronson argued the cause for the railroad appellees. With him on the brief were Emmett E. Mclnnis, Sydney R. Prince, Harold H. McLean, Henry L. Walker and Albert Ward. Appearances were entered by Francis H. Scheetz for appellant in No. 256; John Dickinson for the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.; and Leo J. Hassenauer, V. C. Shuttle-worth and H. E. Wilmarth for the Order of Railway Conductors of America, appellees.
Cases, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.