green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Armstrong v. Emerson Radio & Phonograph Corp.
See Activated Sludge v. Sanitary District of Chicago, D.C.Ill.1946, 64 F.Supp. 25 , affirmed 7 Cir., 157 F.2d 517 , certiorari denied 330 U.S. 834 , 67 S.Ct. 970 , . 91 L.Ed. 1281 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Esso Standard Oil Co.
See Activated Sledge, Inc., v. Sanitary District of Chicago, D.C., 64 F.Supp. 25 , affirmed 7 Cir., 157 F.2d 517 , certiorari denied 330 U.S. 834 , 67 S.Ct. 970 , 91 L.Ed. 1281 , rehearing denied 330 U.S. 856 , 67 S.Ct. 1092 , 91 L.Ed. 1297 ; 331 U.S. 866 , 67 S.Ct. 1347 , 91 L.Ed. 1870 ; Lincoln Electric Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., D.C., 74 F.Supp. 293 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
University Computing Company v. Lykes-Youngstown Corporation
See e.g., Activated Sludge v. Sanitary District of Chicago, 64 F.Supp. 25 (N.D.Ill.1946), aff'd Per Curiam 157 F.,2d 517 (7th Cir. 1946), cert. denied, 330 U.S. 834 , 67 S.Ct. 970 , 91 L.Ed. 1281 (1947) where the Court found no actual profits gained by the defendant, yet concluded 'the law is not impotent in attempting precise valuation, even though no market value exists and no loss or impairment of sales can be proven.' 64 F.Supp. at 27 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.
See, e. g., Activated Sludge v. Sanitary District of Chicago, 64 F.Supp. 25 (N.D.Ill.1946), aff’d Per Curiam 157 F.2d 517 (7th Cir. 1946), cert. denied, 330 U.S. 834 , 67 S.Ct. 970 , 91 L.Ed. 1281 (1947) where the Court found no actual profits gained by the defendant, yet concluded “[t]he law is not impotent in attempting precise valuation, even though no market value exists and no loss or impairment of sales can be proven.” 64 F.Supp. at 27 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kinnison
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 899.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 10, 1947.
Myron G. Ehrlich and Richard L. Tedrow for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert S. Erdahl and Leon XJlman for the United States.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.