Peyton v. Ry. Express Agency, Inc., 330 U.S. 846 (1947). · Go Syfert
Search
Peyton v. Ry. Express Agency, Inc., 330 U.S. 846 (1947). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Section, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., the Industrial Development Board of the City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc. (ca5, 1975-11-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Section, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., the Industrial Development Board of the City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peyton v. Railway Express Agency, 5 Cir. 1947, 158 F.2d 671, 673 , cert. denied, 330 U.S. 846 , 67 S.Ct. 1083 , 91 L.Ed. 1290 ; Schaeper v. Edwards, 6 Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 175, 179 ; Brown v. Coates, 1958, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 253 F.2d 36 ; United States v. Withers, 2 Cir. 1904, 130 F. 696, 698 . 13 Because of the correctness of the directed verdict against the Boards on Counts II and III for failure to adduce evidence of damage, it is unnecessary to consider the directed verdicts on Counts IV and V with respect to the Boards.
discussed Cited "see" Industrial Development Board v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peyton v. Railway Express Agency, 5 Cir. 1947, 158 F.2d 671, 673 , cert. denied, 330 U.S. 846 , 67 S.Ct. 1083 , 91 L.Ed. 1290 ; Schaeper v. Edwards, 6 Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 175, 179 ; Brown v. Coates, 1958, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 253 F.2d 36 ; United States v. Withers, 2 Cir. 1904, 130 F. 696, 698 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. McKensley
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 1962 · signal: see also · confidence low
(People v. Jack, 10 A D 2d 336, 340, affd. 8 N Y 2d 857; see, also, People v. Ackley, 270 App. Div. 958 , affd. 296 N. Y. 731 , same case 330 U. S. 846 ; distinguish People v. Babb, 194 Misc. 5, 6 .) Here, the two counts arise out of one transaction, therefore, the court has no power to sever.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kelly
D. Colo. · 1956 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, McDonald v. Massachusetts, 180 U.S. 311 , 21 S. Ct. 389 , 45 L.Ed. 542 .” The same question was again sought to be raised in habeas corpus proceedings in Velazquez v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 1947, 159 F.2d 606 , certiorari denied 330 U.S. 846 , 67 S.Ct. 1084 , 91 L.Ed. 1291 , and it was held that the Cases decision was conclusive of the point.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peyton
v.
Railway Express Agency, Inc.
No. 1016.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1947.
330 U.S. 846
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.