green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. 40.75 Acres of Land in Du Page County
See United States v. State of New York, 2 Cir., 1947, 160 F.2d 479 , certiorari denied 1947, 331 U.S. 832 , 67 S. Ct. 1512 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-Party
See also Taylor-Edwards Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 715 F.2d 1330, 1336 (9th Cir.1983) (citing the common law rule stated in Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co., 158 F.2d 490, 493 (9th Cir.1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 832 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1846 (1947) that extreme hardship is not sufficient to excuse non-performance on the ground of impossibility, but noting a trend in "[m]ore modern cases" to allow the defense where performance would be extremely costly or onerous although not literally impossible). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twin City Fire Insurance v. Philadelphia Life Insurance
See also Taylor-Edwards Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 715 F.2d 1330, 1336 (9th Cir.1983) (citing the common law rule stated in Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co., 158 F.2d 490, 493 (9th Cir.1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 832 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1846 (1947) that extreme hardship is not sufficient to excuse non-performance on the ground of impossibility, but noting a trend in “[m]ore modern cases” to allow the defense where performance would be extremely costly or onerous although not literally impossible). 3.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Certain Land in Borough of Manhattan
See also, United States v. State of New York, 160 F.2d. 479, 480 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 832 , 67 S.Ct. 1512 , 91 L.Ed. 1846 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Certain Parcels of Land
See Old Dominion Land Co. v. United States, supra; see also United States v. State of New York, 2 Cir., 1947, 160 F.2d 479 , certiorari denied 331 U.S. 832 , 67 S.Ct. 1512 , 91 L.Ed. 1846 ; Brown v. United States, 263 U.S. 78 , 44 S.Ct. 92 , 68 L.Ed. 171 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fujikawa
v.
Sunrise Soda Works Co.
v.
Sunrise Soda Works Co.
No. 1210.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1947.
R. A. Vitousek, Masaji Marumoto and Henry F. Butler for petitioners. Kennett B. Dawson for respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.