Holmes v. United States, 339 U.S. 927 (1950). · Go Syfert
Search
Holmes v. United States, 339 U.S. 927 (1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Water Carriers Ass'n v. United States (nysd, 1954-11-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" National Water Carriers Ass'n v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1954 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holmes v. United StateS) D.C.S.D.N.Y., 89 F.supp. 894, affirmed 339 U.S. 927 , 70 S.Ct. 628 , 94 L.Ed. 1348 ; Refrigerated Transport v. United States, D.C.N.D.Tex., 101 F.Supp. 95 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kafes
3rd Cir. · 1954 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Croes-sant, 3 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 96 , certio-rari denied, 1950, 339 U.S. 927 , 70 S.Ct. 626 , 94 L.Ed. 1348 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holmes
v.
United States
No. 657.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 3, 1950.
339 U.S. 927
David M. Palley for appellants., Solicitor General Perl-man and Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and Harold J. Gallagher and Mark F. Hughes for the Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad Co., appellees.
Published

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.