green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Curry v. United States
See Potter Title & Trust Co. v. Ohio Barge Line, 184 F.2d 432, 434 (3d Cir. 1950), cert. den., 340 U.S. 955 , 71 S.Ct. 567 , 95 L.Ed. 689 (1951); Willey v. Alaska Packers’ Ass’n, 18 F.2d 8, 11 (9th Cir. 1917).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trevor A. Waldron v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Id. at 596; see also Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85, 87-88 (2d Cir.1993) (collecting cases). 15 However, both Campillo and Fernandez-Collado explicitly drew a distinction from Chung Young Chew v. Boyd, 309 F.2d 857, 865 (9th Cir.1962) and Slavik v. Miller, 89 F.Supp. 575, 576 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd, 184 F.2d 575 (3d Cir.1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 955 , 71 S.Ct. 566 , 95 L.Ed. 688 (1951), two cases in which the INS was deemed to have "technical custody" over petitioners.
Clark
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 260.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1951.
340 U.S. 955
Herbert K. Hyde for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney and Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.