Latimer v. Washington, 343 U.S. 936 (1952). · Go Syfert
Search
Latimer v. Washington, 343 U.S. 936 (1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re B.E.S. (ohioctapp, 2014-02-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In re B.E.S.
Ohio Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
In re Hua (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 227 , * * *; see Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. ‘(Procedural) (d)ue process of law involves the essential rights of notice, hearing and the opportunity to be heard before a competent tribunal.’ Bakaitis v. Bakaitis (May 23, 1983), Montgomery App. No. 7997, 1983 Ohio App. LEXIS 12648 , citing State v. Edwards (1952), 157 Ohio St. 175 , * * *, cert. denied 343 U.S. 936 , * * *.
discussed Cited "see" Price v. Nixon
Ohio Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
In re Hua (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 227 ; see Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. “[Procedural] [d]ue process of law involves the essential rights of notice, hearing and the opportunity to be heard before a competent tribunal.” Bakaitis v. Bakaitis (May 23, 1983), Montgomery App. No. 7997, citing State v. Edwards (1952), 157 Ohio St. 175 , cert. denied 343 U.S. 936 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Latimer
v.
Washington
No. 426.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 28, 1952.
343 U.S. 936
Published

Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.