green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“testimony would at best serve to only impeach”
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Chang v. City of Albany
testimony would at best serve to only impeach
discussed
Cited "see"
Battle v. Thornton
Even in medical malpractice actions we have held that “a physician need not be a specialist in the field of which he [or she] speaks in order to testify as an expert.” Ornoff v. Kuhn and Kogan Chartered, 549 A.2d 728, 732 (D.C.1988) (quoting Baerman v. Reisinger, 363 F.2d 309, 310 (1966)); District of Columbia v. Anderson, 597 A.2d 1295, 1299 (D.C.1991) ("medical expert need not be a specialist in order to be qualified to offer an opinion”); see Sher v. De Haven, 199 F.2d 777, 782 (1952) (same) cert. denied, 345 U.S. 936 , 73 S.Ct. 797 , 97 L.Ed. 1363 (1953). "[I]t is the actual qualific…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Columbus Curry, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. On Lee, 201 F.2d 722 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 936 , 73 S.Ct. 798 , 97 L.Ed. 1364 (1953); Harrison v. United States, 191 F.2d 874, 876 (5 Cir. 1951).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Pellegrino
See United States v. On Lee, 2 Cir., 201 F.2d 722 , certiorari denied 345 U.S. 936 , 73 S.Ct. 798 , 97 L.Ed. 1364 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jesse B. Manbeck v. Gerald S. Ostrowski
See also Sher v. DeHaven, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 257 , 199 F.2d 777 , 36 A.L.R.2d 937 (1952), cert. denied 345 U.S. 936 , 73 S.Ct. 797 , 97 L.Ed. 1363 (1953). 32 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buffington v. Wood
See also Rule 34 13 Sher v. De Haven, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 257 , 199 F.2d 777 , 36 A.L.R.2d 937 rehearing denied (1952), 345 U.S. 936 , 73 S.Ct. 797 , 97 L.Ed. 1363 , is a similar case in that there plaintiff had been examined by defendant's physicians, and in ours plaintiffs have agreed to such examination and may by now have been examined.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antranik Paroutian
See Higgins v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 371 , 160 F.2d 222 (D.C.Cir.1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 822 , 67 S.Ct. 1304 , 91 L.Ed. 1839 (1947); compare United States v. On Lee, 201 F.2d 722 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 936 , 73 S.Ct. 798 , 97 L.Ed. 1364 (1953). , Finally, appellant contends that the judgment below should be reversed because of the failure of the trial judge to strike from the record, under the terms of the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (d), the testimony of Luiz De Almeida, a prosecution witness, after the Government failed to produce a statement which he allegedly gav…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gonzalez
See also United States v. On Lee, 201 F.2d 722 (C.A.2), cert. denied 345 U.S. 936 , 73 S.Ct. 798 , 97 L.Ed. 1364 (1953).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Malone
v.
King
v.
King
No. 390.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 13, 1953.
345 U.S. 936
Published
Citer courts: N.D. New York (1)
Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.