green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
J. E. Smothers and Doris Smothers v. United States
(2×)
But see United States v. Arcade Co., 6 Cir. 1953, 203 F.2d 230 , cert. denied, 1953, 346 U.S. 826 , 74 S.Ct. 48 , 98 L.Ed. 352 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fierro v. Gomez
Justice Mosk noted that the California Supreme Court had last analyzed execution by lethal gas in 1953 and that, at the time, the court had implied that it was "controlled by our scientific knowledge of the subject.” Id. at 3 (quoting People v. Daugherty, 40 Cal.2d 876, 895 , 256 P.2d 911, 922 (1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 827 , 74 S.Cl. 47, 98 L.Ed. 352 (1953)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Del Percio
Accord, Butzman v. United States, 205 F.2d 343, 351 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 50 , 98 L.Ed. 353 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hilton Benn, Jr., United States of America v. James W. Hunt
(2×)
See Tr. 227-28 9 Doran v. United States, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 305 , 306, 205 F.2d 717, 718 , cert. denied, 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 49 , 98 L.Ed. 352 (1953) 10 District of Columbia v. Armes, 107 U.S. 519, 521-522 , 2 S.Ct. 840 , 27 L.Ed. 618 (1882); In re Penn, 143 U.S.App.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hagan
See Butzman v. United States, 205 F.2d 343 (6 Cir. 1963), cert. den. 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 50 , 98 L.Ed. 353 (1963), and United States v. Horwitz, 247 F.Supp. 412 (N.D.Ill.1965), which held that the statute of limitations for the offense charged does not begin to run until the return is filed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ray Pocatello v. United States
(2×)
See Doran v. United States, 1953, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 305 , 205 F.2d 717 , cert. den., 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 49 , 98 L.Ed. 352 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel J. Koenig and Charles Forest Waugaman, United States of America v. Daniel J. Koenig, United States of America v. Charles Forest Waugaman
See Butzman v. United States, 205 F.2d 343, 350 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 50 , 98 L.Ed. 353 ; Spaeth v. United States, 254 F.2d 924 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 358 U.S. 831 , 79 S.Ct. 52 , 3 L.Ed.2d 69 . 6 That the trial court did not commit an abuse of discretion in denying the motion for continuance is supported by the principles of the following cases, among others: Rogers v. United States, 128 F.2d 973, 974 (C.A. 5); Franken v. United States, 248 F.2d 789, 790 (C.A. 4), certiorari denied355 U.S. 956, 78 S.Ct. 541 , 2 L.Ed.2d 532 ; United States v. Moran, 194 F.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Koenig
See Butzman v. United States, 205 F.2d 343, 350 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 50 , 98 L.Ed. 353 ; Spaeth v. United States, 254 F.2d 924 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 358 U.S. 831 , 79 S.Ct. 52 , 3 L.Ed.2d 69 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., Doran v. United States, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 305 , 205 F.2d 717 , cert. denied, 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 49 , 98 L.Ed. 352 (1953). .Appellants also allege that Maretta Chase was not sworn as a witness.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Arcade Company
v.
Arcade Company
No. 219.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1953.
Acting Solicitor General Davis for the United States. F. A. Berry for respondents.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.