Kuchin v. Chicago & North W. Ry. Co., 348 U.S. 840 (1954). · Go Syfert
Search
Kuchin v. Chicago & North W. Ry. Co., 348 U.S. 840 (1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
172 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 50 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Kadadu (michctapp, 1988-06-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Kadadu
Mich. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v Parrino, 212 F2d 919 (CA 2, 1954), cert den 348 US 840 ; 75 S Ct 46 ; 99 L Ed 663 (1954); United States v Sambro, 147 US App DC 75; 454 F2d 918 (1971); United States v Santelises, 476 F2d 787 (CA 2, 1973); Michel v United States, 507 F2d 461, 464-66 (CA 2, 1974); Nunez Cordero v United States, 533 F2d 723 (CA 1, 1976).
cited Cited "see" People v. Correa
Ill. App. Ct. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Parrino (2d Cir. 1954), 212 F.2d 919 , 922, cert. denied (1954), 348 U.S. 840 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rodriguez
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Parrino, 212 F.2d 919 (2d Cir. 1954), cert. den. 348 U.S. 840 , 75 S.Ct. 46 , 99 L.Ed. 663 (1954). *555 We hold that the possibility of deportation was not a “consequence” as to which there was a duty to inform appellant before acceptance of his plea of guilty.
discussed Cited "see" J. C. McDonald v. George A. Kropp, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan (2×)
6th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Parrino, 212 F.2d 919, 921 (CA 2, 1954), cert. den. 348 U.S. 840 , 75 S.Ct. 46 , 99 L.Ed. 663 .
discussed Cited "see" Taylor v. England (2×)
D.C. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jason v. Summerfield, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 197 , 214 F.2d 273 , cert. denied 348 U.S. 840 , 75 S.Ct. 48 , 99 L.Ed. 662 (1954); Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Federal Power Com’n, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 395 , 202 F.2d 190 (1952); Churchill Tabernacle v. Federal Communications Com’n, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 411 , 160 F.2d 244 (1947). 3 .
discussed Cited "see" Foster v. Laroque (2×)
E.D. La. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jason v. Summerfield, 1954, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 197 , 214 F.2d 273 , cert. den. 348 U.S. 840 , 75 S.Ct. 48 , 99 L.Ed. 662 (1954); 5 U.S.C. § 652a; Capolino v. Kelly, S.D.N.Y., 1964, 236 F.Supp. 955 , aff’d 339 F.2d 1023 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Carson v. State
Wyo. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Parrino, 212 F.2d 919, 922 (2d Cir.1954), Frank, Circuit Judge (dissenting), cert. denied 348 U.S. 840 , 75 S.Ct. 46 , 99 L.Ed. 663 (1954).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Polk v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Parrino, 212 F.2d 919 (2d Cir.1954) (deportation), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 840 , 75 S.Ct. 46 , 99 L.Ed. 663 (1954); Edwards v. State, 393 So.2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Knowles v. State, 356 So.2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (no requirement to advise of mandatory minimum sentence prior to adoption of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(i)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Old Dutch Farms, Inc. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Local Union No. 584 (2×)
E.D.N.Y · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Pearson v. Williams, 202 U.S. 281, 284-285 , 26 S.Ct. 608, 609 , 50 L.Ed. 1029 (1906), where the administrative inquiry was summary in nature, and, Jason v. Summerfield, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 197 , 214 F.2d 273, 276 , cert. denied, 348 U.S. 840 , 75 S.Ct. 48 , 99 L.Ed. 662 (1954), where an administrative tribunal was permitted to change its position after the underlying executive order was amended. 8 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kuchin
v.
Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
No. 201.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1954.
348 U.S. 840
James A. Dooley for petitioner., Otis Lowell Hastings and Drennan J. Slater for respondent.
Are, Black, Granted, Should.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.