green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Strickland v. State
See McVeigh v. State, 73 So.2d 694 (Fla.1954), appeal dismissed, 348 U.S. 885 , 75 S.Ct. 210 , 99 L.Ed. 696 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. Regan
See Granville-Smith v. Granville-Smith, 349 U.S. 1, 4 , 75 S.Ct. 553, 555 , 99 L.Ed. 773 (1955) ("In view of the lack of genuine adversary proceedings at any stage in this litigation, the outcome of which could have far-reaching consequences on domestic relations throughout the United States, the Court invited specially qualified counsel 'to appear and present oral argument, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.' ") (quoting from Granville-Smith v. Granville-Smith, 348 U.S. 885, 885-86 , 75 S.Ct. 205 , 99 L.Ed. 696 (1954)). 30 Treasury, Postal Service, and General Government Appr…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. Regan
See Granville-Smith v. Granville-Smith, 349 U.S. 1, 4 , 75 S.Ct. 553, 555 , 99 L.Ed. 773 (1955) (“In view of the lack of genuine adversary proceedings at any stage in this litigation, the outcome of which could have far-reaching consequences on domestic relations throughout the United States, the Court invited specially qualified counsel ‘to appear and present oral argument, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.’ ”) (quoting from Granville-Smith v. Granville-Smith, 348 U.S. 885, 885-86 , 75 S.Ct. 205 , 99 L.Ed. 696 (1954)). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Libby v. City of Dillingham
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Seltenreich v. Town of Fairbanks, 103 F.Supp. 319 (D.Alaska 1952), aff'd, 211 F.2d 83 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 887 , 75 S.Ct. 206 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954). .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re the Tax Appeal of Heftel Broadcasting Honolulu, Inc.
See Stone v. Stapling Machines Co., 220 Miss. 470 , 71 So.2d 205 (1954), appeal dismissed, 348 U.S. 802 , 75 S.Ct. 31 , 99 L.Ed. 633 (1954), reh. den., 348 U.S. 884 , 75 S.Ct. 123 , 99 L.Ed. 695 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
O'BRYAN v. State
See McVeigh v. State, Fla., 73 So.2d 694 , appeal dismissed 348 U.S. 885 , 75 S.Ct. 210 , 99 L.Ed. 696 ; and Clark v. State, Fla.App. 1st, 281 So.2d 915 .
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. State
See McVeigh v. State, 73 So.2d 694 (Fla.1954), App. dismd. 348 U.S. 885 , 75 S.Ct. 210 , 99 L.Ed. 696 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marrone v. State
See Gicinto v. United States, 8 Cir., 1954, 212 F.2d 8 , certiorari denied, 1954, 348 U.S. 884 , 75 S.Ct. 125 , 99 L.Ed. 695 ; also cf., State v. Patterson, 1935, 183 Wash. 239 , 48 P.2d 193, 196, 197 . 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of San Antonio v. Aguilar
The governmental or legislative functions are assigned to the city council; the proprietary or ministerial functions, to the city manager. § 2; § 46(3); see Ostrom v. San Antonio, 94 Tex. 523 , 62 S.W. 909, 910 (1901); see also Seltenreich v. Fairbanks, 103 F.Supp. 319 (D.Alaska 1952), aff'd, 211 F.2d 83 (9th Cir.1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 887 , 75 S.Ct. 206 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954); Visone v. Reilly, 80 N.J.Super. 494 , 194 A.2d 248, 250 (1963); Welch v. City of Long Beach, 109 Cal.App.2d 561 , 241 P.2d 26, 28 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christopher v. State
See also, McVeigh v. State, 73 So.2d 694, 696 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 348 U.S. 885 , 75 S.Ct. 210 , 99 L.Ed. 696 (1954); and Dodson v. State, 334 So.2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), cert. denied, 341 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of North Carolina v. United States
(2×)
See also Louisiana Public Service Commission v. United States, D.C., 125 F.Supp. 180 , affirmed 348 U.S. 885 , 75 S.Ct. 206 , and State of Tennessee v. United States, D.C., 113 F.Supp. 634 , affirmed 346 U.S. 891 , 74 S.Ct. 222 , 98 L.Ed. 394 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louisiana Public Service Commission
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 351.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 22, 1954.
Fred S. LeBlanc, Attorney General of Louisiana, Joel B. Dickinson, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert A. Ainsworth, Jr. for the Louisiana Public Service Commission, and Louis A. Schwartz for the New Orleans Traffic & Transportation Bureau et al., appellants., Solicitor General Sobeloff and Edward M. Reidy for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and Harry McCall, William E. Davis, A. J. Dixon, Harold E. Spencer and Y. D. Lott for the Arkansas & Louisiana Railway Co. et al., appellees.
Cited by 31 opinions | Published
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Per Curiam:The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.