Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey, 348 U.S. 970 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey, 348 U.S. 970 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Capital Transit Company, a Corporation v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation (cadc, 1955-08-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Capital Transit Company, a Corporation v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation
D.C. Cir. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mackey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 7 Cir., 218 F.2d 295 , certiorari granted, 1955, 348 U.S. 970 , 75 S.Ct. 535 , and cases there cited.
cited Cited "see" Rieser v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
2d Cir. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey, 348 U.S. 970 , 75 S.Ct. 535 .
cited Cited "see" Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad Company
2d Cir. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey, 348 U.S. 970 , 75 S.Ct. 535 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Woods v. Sheehan
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
We, however, have held that the "willingness to use force to protect the community or to stop another from taking a life is consistent with conscientious objector status." United States v. Haughton, 413 F.2d 736, 742 (9th Cir.1969); see also Hinkle v. United States, 216 F.2d 8, 10 (9th Cir.1954) (applicant’s expressed belief in right to defend self and family did not negative a conscientious objection to participation in war in any form), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 970 , 75 S.Ct. 529 , 99 L.Ed. 755 (1955). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Woods v. Sheehan
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Therefore, according to the Marine Corps, Woods' willingness to kill in self defense precludes him from making out a prima facie claim We, however, have held that the "willingness to use force to protect the community or to stop another from taking a life is consistent with conscientious objector status." United States v. Haughton, 413 F.2d 736, 742 (9th Cir.1969); see also Hinkle v. United States, 216 F.2d 8, 10 (9th Cir.1954) (applicant's expressed belief in right to defend self and family did not negative a conscientious objection to participation in war in any form), cert. denied, 348 U.S.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jeffrey Hale Purvis
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Tomlinson v. United States, 216 F.2d 12 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 970 , 75 S.Ct. 528 , 99 L.Ed. 755 (1955); Kent v. United States, 207 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1953); cf. Keefer v. United States, 313 F.2d 773 (9th Cir. 1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
v.
Mackey
No. 617.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1955.
348 U.S. 970
Frank H. Marks for petitioner., John Paul Stevens for Mackey, respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.